Re: kldxref: /boot/kernel/kernel: no ELF relocation table found
- In reply to: Jessica Clarke : "Re: kldxref: /boot/kernel/kernel: no ELF relocation table found"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Mon, 02 Sep 2024 18:06:13 UTC
On 9/2/24 13:57, Jessica Clarke wrote: > On 2 Sep 2024, at 11:54, Dennis Clarke <dclarke@blastwave.org> wrote: >> >> >> All: >> >> Ye ol "make installkernel" starts nicely but ends a little odd : >> . . . <snip> . . >> kldxref /boot/kernel >> kldxref: /boot/kernel/kernel: no ELF relocation table found >> >> -------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>> Installing kernel GENERIC completed on Mon Sep 2 10:13:55 UTC 2024 >> -------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> >> >> >> So then ... "no ELF relocation table found"? >> >> Looking at https://cgit.freebsd.org/src/tree/usr.sbin/kldxref/ef.c#n220 >> and then downwards to line 367 : >> >> if (rel_off == 0 && rela_off == 0) { >> warnx("%s: no ELF relocation table found\n", ef->ef_name); >> error = EFTYPE; >> goto out; >> } >> . . . <snip> . . >> So therefore the situation : >> >> ( 1 ) well understood and just a normal red herring[1] >> >> ( 2 ) ignore it >> >> ( 3 ) huh? that's weird. never saw that before. >> >> Curious what is going on there. > > It’s a harmless warning from an overly-careful set of checks. The tool > was refactored and this case went from being ignored to warning. Cc’ing > jhb@ to remind him of this as I pointed it out a while ago. > > Jess Thank you once again ! So this is a serious case of " ( 2 ) ignore it " for now. I figured that the output from readelf -delV was darn similar to the previous kernel. So ... yeah ... I ignored it. Onwards and upwards and I may even get some docs written up. -- Dennis Clarke RISC-V/SPARC/PPC/ARM/CISC UNIX and Linux spoken