From nobody Thu Aug 29 17:43:23 2024 X-Original-To: riscv@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4WvpY56vJHz5THRn for ; Thu, 29 Aug 2024 17:43:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dclarke@blastwave.org) Received: from mail.oetec.com (mail.oetec.com [108.160.241.186]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature ECDSA (P-256) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mail.oetec.com", Issuer "E5" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4WvpY51Qxzz59FQ for ; Thu, 29 Aug 2024 17:43:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dclarke@blastwave.org) Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=blastwave.org header.s=default header.b=U+yuUIve; dmarc=pass (policy=quarantine) header.from=blastwave.org; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of dclarke@blastwave.org designates 108.160.241.186 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=dclarke@blastwave.org Received: from [172.16.35.3] (pool-99-253-118-250.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [99.253.118.250]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.oetec.com (8.17.1/8.17.1) with ESMTPSA id 47THhODi059825 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128 verify=NOT) for ; Thu, 29 Aug 2024 13:43:34 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from dclarke@blastwave.org) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=blastwave.org; s=default; t=1724953414; bh=DbZdEn2BfGB8dVW9Qt7xDqC0si7VFR1MhSMTOAVuqvw=; h=Date:To:From:Subject; b=U+yuUIvetZ6/GOGsfKhXtvyJySVWqlbrQFQoVMKD7LLh6MXftt01QkbIU+RB8KfPC owKbrG7tzMcdVqc6UUyVwsShIdh+auFVW6nKS0ZqleQv0nnsz/IEe7vGDdUOmCxh5h 784X8j/p+SBFoLU/K5zIu1daGATy+XVYnyz8VCwD2UfdASiilVAtPv7Mng+MU5cP2g rdFLow6/BjD6cGnl4TOM6GdpI6Svd1ZwZ5Fos7XyTweCS7nvzHjJfYEtfdvjF0zQmU d0QFulX4HLaMrIMU8eIu4KTk/wmlyRAYfZnD0w+rwLy/4rpDcrltY8PrhBTavwSYaq ZFHbsIS6lB4IA== Message-ID: Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2024 13:43:23 -0400 List-Id: FreeBSD on the RISC-V instruction set architecture List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-riscv List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-BeenThere: freebsd-riscv@freebsd.org Sender: owner-freebsd-riscv@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird To: riscv@FreeBSD.org Content-Language: en-CA From: Dennis Clarke Subject: Question about the docs at https://wiki.freebsd.org/riscv/ports Organization: GENUNIX Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-oetec-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-oetec-MailScanner-ID: 47THhODi059825 X-oetec-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-oetec-MailScanner-From: dclarke@blastwave.org X-Spam-Status: No X-Spamd-Bar: ---- X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.69 / 15.00]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-0.999]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[blastwave.org,quarantine]; RCVD_DKIM_ARC_DNSWL_MED(-0.50)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED(-0.20)[108.160.241.186:from]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[blastwave.org:s=default]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; XM_UA_NO_VERSION(0.01)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; HAS_ORG_HEADER(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[riscv@freebsd.org]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[blastwave.org:+]; MLMMJ_DEST(0.00)[riscv@FreeBSD.org]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:812, ipnet:108.160.240.0/20, country:CA]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[] X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4WvpY51Qxzz59FQ Dear RISC-V user types : I have a package server that does daily builds for amd64 with jails setup for 13.3 and 14.1 and of course CURRENT. This works really well and generally gets the job done for all of KDE5 and LXDE and XFCE plus some database tools and other tidbits. Roughly 3 or 4 hours for 1800 packages and that serves me well. Regarding the docs for riscv64 package builds at : https://wiki.freebsd.org/riscv/ports I see that it says we need qemu-user-static built and installed and then I *may* be able to setup a riscv64 jail? My plan is to try and get a 14.1 jail as well as a CURRENT jail from the sources I have built the host with. However qemu is just horribly slow. So terrible that I may have to wait a week to get that jail built. So therefore : (1) are those docs still reasonable ? (2) is it just a waste of time ? I have the little SiFive UnMatched board which is supposed to all "just work" per https://wiki.freebsd.org/riscv#Supported_Platforms and I have a Samsung 990 SSD M.2 thing on it. Will it be able to run proper poudriere package builds without too much horror ? -- -- Dennis Clarke RISC-V/SPARC/PPC/ARM/CISC UNIX and Linux spoken