From nobody Mon Oct 10 18:06:27 2022 X-Original-To: riscv@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4MmRhH2p5Lz4dgCh for ; Mon, 10 Oct 2022 18:07:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dclarke@blastwave.org) Received: from mail.oetec.com (mail.oetec.com [108.160.241.186]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.oetec.com", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4MmRhG58Lnz3D7f for ; Mon, 10 Oct 2022 18:07:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dclarke@blastwave.org) X-Spam-Status: No X-oetec-MailScanner-From: dclarke@blastwave.org X-oetec-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-5.104, required 6, autolearn=not spam, ALL_TRUSTED -1.00, BAYES_00 -1.90, DKIM_SIGNED 0.10, DKIM_VALID -0.10, DKIM_VALID_AU -0.10, DKIM_VALID_EF -0.10, NICE_REPLY_A -2.01, URIBL_BLOCKED 0.00, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS 0.00, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS 0.00) X-oetec-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-oetec-MailScanner-ID: 29AI6SFp016707 X-oetec-MailScanner-Information: Please contact oetec for more information Received: from [172.16.35.2] (cpeac202e7325b3-cmac202e7325b0.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [99.253.170.241]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.oetec.com (8.15.2/8.15.2/Debian-8+deb9u1) with ESMTPSA id 29AI6SFp016707 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NOT) for ; Mon, 10 Oct 2022 14:06:30 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=blastwave.org; s=default; t=1665425190; bh=8qvWV/MawV4xvdg+dGyoaKCXmclJ+e4erTmpVZvdmvM=; h=Date:Subject:To:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=MPUsK016EtNr09lktVhRnPmox3m4TttTBAywXVfbAOE4bPbNzxMLbADFghaAjRdf2 IiGbcCkPIy3zn7SK2HPd125OiOn/HjxrRRtCMcP8VEr66xvKuzaKzQKkmsylKQSWha oprYzgLfzPb9NJr8Uadgj6glLtxPoZVo2vN7Dg+J9iCt+GvGmND6Hb3UQkhoeJYLLk CfuVsooXHbxg1ryzeNd88JBk9B0EV07enL7bAqE2rkr3l1md4zRSYA7Q6/FUB92roC h72IEhwCm4i6mCo35nX1NcHt2Tv+pVXesuxNgk/CnfQ7Sw30qBWKkKZZGA2RmSm9g9 e7++osDZ/r+yw== Message-ID: <832a6107-e9db-07b8-1f47-47f185635ecc@blastwave.org> Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2022 18:06:27 +0000 List-Id: FreeBSD on the RISC-V instruction set architecture List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-riscv List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-riscv@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-riscv@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.13.0 Subject: Re: oops .. looks like the FreeBSD snapshot for 07 Oct 2022 is still a tad fried Content-Language: en-US To: riscv@freebsd.org References: <44de855e-8c40-8744-3e05-0a94446e3369@blastwave.org> From: Dennis Clarke In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4MmRhG58Lnz3D7f X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=blastwave.org header.s=default header.b=MPUsK016; dmarc=pass (policy=quarantine) header.from=blastwave.org; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of dclarke@blastwave.org designates 108.160.241.186 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=dclarke@blastwave.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.70 / 15.00]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-0.999]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[blastwave.org,quarantine]; RCVD_DKIM_ARC_DNSWL_MED(-0.50)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+a:c]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED(-0.20)[108.160.241.186:from]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[blastwave.org:s=default]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MLMMJ_DEST(0.00)[riscv@freebsd.org]; ASN(0.00)[asn:812, ipnet:108.160.240.0/20, country:CA]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[blastwave.org:+]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[riscv@freebsd.org]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[] X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N On 10/10/22 16:48, Mitchell Horne wrote: > > > On 10/10/22 00:33, Dennis Clarke wrote: >> >> Looking at : https://cgit.freebsd.org/src/log/ >> >> I see a bunch of goodness from Mitchel Horne there for the >> pmap_remove_pages() code but the install disk images for >> FreeBSD CURRENT snapshot still blow up. >> >> Are there going to be some new install images soonish? >> This week maybe? >> >> Found 4 CPUs in the device tree >> Copyright (c) 1992-2022 The FreeBSD Project. >> Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 >>          The Regents of the University of California. All rights >> reserved. >> FreeBSD is a registered trademark of The FreeBSD Foundation. >> FreeBSD 14.0-CURRENT #0 main-n258483-b05b1ecbef0: Fri Oct  7 05:52:47 >> UTC 2022 >> >> root@releng1.nyi.freebsd.org:/usr/obj/usr/src/riscv.riscv64/sys/GENERIC riscv >> >> FreeBSD clang version 14.0.5 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project.git >> llvmorg-14.0.5-0-gc12386ae247c) >> WARNING: WITNESS option enabled, expect reduced performance. >> VT: init without driver. >> Preloaded elf kernel "/boot/kernel/kernel" at 0xffffffc002bff000. >> Preloaded TSLOG data "TSLOG" at 0xffffffc002c08288. >> . >> . >> . >> avail memory = 16649957376 (15878 MB) >> No static device mappings. >> Starting CPU 2 (hart 0) >> Starting CPU 3 (hart 1) >> Starting CPU 1 (hart 3) >> FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor System Detected: 4 CPUs >> panic: ISA string truncated > > Hi, > > This one is known too. There are some shortcomings with how we handle > the ISA string provided by QEMU, that became apparent with the recent > update to version 7.1.0. > > Fixing this is a priority for me this week, ideally before the next > snapshot build. For progress, subscribe to: > https://reviews.freebsd.org/D36601 > > As a workaround in the meantime, you can downgrade to the qemu6 or > qemu70 packages. These versions will not cause this panic. > > Cheers, > Mitchell Ah ha ! Had to be QEMU! I was testing this over and over with Steve Wills and he had a slightly previous version of QEMU on his FreeBSD 14.0 CURRENT system. I had the very latest ( okay five days ago ) and saw the panic over and over. For him, everything was working fine. What fun that was to try to explain. Thank you for letting me know! -- Dennis Clarke RISC-V/SPARC/PPC/ARM/CISC UNIX and Linux spoken GreyBeard and suspenders optional