Re: Sipeed Lichee RV (Allwinner D1)
- Reply: Jakob Alvermark : "Re: Sipeed Lichee RV (Allwinner D1)"
- In reply to: Mitchell Horne : "Re: Sipeed Lichee RV (Allwinner D1)"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2022 15:12:58 UTC
On 1/28/22 16:29, Mitchell Horne wrote: > On 1/19/22 18:05, Jakob Alvermark wrote: >> >> On 1/19/22 17:24, Mitchell Horne wrote: >>> >>> >>> On 1/17/22 15:02, Jakob Alvermark wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> >>>> With RISC-V SBCs now coming down in price, I got curios and got >>>> myself a Lichee RV (with the dock). >>>> >>>> https://linux-sunxi.org/Sipeed_Lichee_RV >>>> >>>> The instructions here, https://linux-sunxi.org/Allwinner_Nezha >>>> along with some patching got me a working U-boot. >>>> >>>> Cross-building and putting together and image for and SD card got >>>> me this far: >>>> >> <snip> >>>> Loading kernel... >>>> /boot/kernel/kernel text=0x609ddc text=0x133abc data=0xf4420 >>>> data=0xb54+0x1d73e4 syms=[0x8+0xcd188+0x8+0xee5ae] >>>> Loading configured modules... >>>> can't find '/etc/hostid' >>>> can't find '/boot/entropy' >>>> Using DTB provided by EFI at 0x47ef5000. >>>> Kernel entry at 0x56a0002e... >>>> Kernel args: (null) >>>> >>>> ----- >>>> >>>> And here it stops forĀ ~16 seconds then restarts, that's the >>>> watchdog resetting it. >>>> >>>> So where do I go from here? >>>> >>> Hi Jakob, >>> >>> Looks like it bails somewhere in the initial kernel setup, before >>> the first output to the console. This is a wide range, so it's >>> difficult to say exactly where things are going wrong. >>> >>> I will say that generally FreeBSD is not expected to work on the D1; >>> as far as I know you are the first to try it. This hardware has some >>> quirks requiring special support, which we are entirely lacking. >>> Specifically, there is one related to virtual memory management, >>> which requires custom (spec-breaking) bits in the page tables to be >>> set, to properly specify the attributes of physical and device >>> memory. This _may_ have something to do with why it is failing where >>> it is. It would take a motivated party to add the support required >>> for this SoC, and I'm not aware of anyone currently taking this on. >>> This board has caused some headaches in Linux-land for the same >>> reasons, but there are more hands to do the work there. I just want >>> to set the expectations properly :) >>> >>> If you wanted to debug this further, you might rebuild the kernel >>> after adding 'options EARLY_PRINTF' to the config file, as this >>> should enable a couple early outputs and narrow down the search >>> slightly. >> >> >> Hi Mitchell, >> >> >> I did not expect it to work. But it would be nice if it did. >> >> I have a long experience with FreeBSD and I have played around with a >> couple of different ARM-boards, but I'm not very experienced with >> kernel hacking. >> >> I built a kernel with EARLY_PRINTF, but it did not give me any more >> output... >> >> Is there anything else I could try? >> > > Yes, I missed an important detail: the required uart driver is missing > from the kernel. Please add 'device uart_snps' to the kernel config as > well, and see if this results in any output. Hi, I tried that, but sadly it did not make any difference. I looked at what they have done in Linux, and this commit seems to have some interesting bits: https://github.com/smaeul/linux/commit/c1bc61cee73e236c3cd69fe6c998b7f80c654263#diff-4f4bb4eea826b523d76ddb1c539dad5685a0e7fd7cc8f1089a0493efd0e8e5b8 Jakob