From nobody Tue Mar 15 11:58:31 2022 X-Original-To: rc@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE7931A16471 for ; Tue, 15 Mar 2022 11:58:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mpp302@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ed1-f53.google.com (mail-ed1-f53.google.com [209.85.208.53]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1D4" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4KHsPN1Hrpz3MKs for ; Tue, 15 Mar 2022 11:58:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mpp302@gmail.com) Received: by mail-ed1-f53.google.com with SMTP id m12so23807488edc.12 for ; Tue, 15 Mar 2022 04:58:32 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent :content-language:to:references:from:subject:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=ndgeDpxhCv//jI11ZXRxPmpgTORDuUIztqBISgDdIkM=; b=ACntZr52NYIv6PSXDhpgJRdgRmzutXpgWV/7+xE0irnYylokTramPGsVjvjWHu662A hkm108jl1pj4Cb/o2tNw3RTVqcvWMZETHffguUFDOj94Hv3k1aOC4CNLlluGgDSpwAq7 5IaPK+FLpKdDH/6ptT/+hAmzcxsEvCmFYLEE9zz4kQikPwGv6w9EFMudj/cHWk+nkyjH vHd4fexbikAeLZ8hRRRxD8nxDBW2bO4yekCYEhRV4HhO3K2cgeIcctYflZPx/z+fyujY 7vFneZmsz0cD+q/9mhYGi90U0R+0YzMzi6jI0e7AjEpbSeSTEAKdx8//asZoqp0ei3AS 3QIw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531x8UfcAmChKSxTPyjjyHnlBpUoBKi3EPeGBH+gl0AU5ya3g2X8 P2V4wcnK4ueMh5uPYH2yqQQ= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzEBLMBS1+lIs0TWLRD9ZC8JuiCajL66bvATbdQs/GXwdzjjW2y1DTgAoVUQhHDtAS/cydf/Q== X-Received: by 2002:aa7:d5d9:0:b0:416:1dd3:7714 with SMTP id d25-20020aa7d5d9000000b004161dd37714mr24866222eds.256.1647345511085; Tue, 15 Mar 2022 04:58:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPV6:2a02:8109:9880:1d70:5e5f:67ff:fef4:ffd8? ([2a02:8109:9880:1d70:5e5f:67ff:fef4:ffd8]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id r22-20020a17090638d600b006d584aaa9c9sm8026763ejd.133.2022.03.15.04.58.30 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 15 Mar 2022 04:58:30 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2022 12:58:31 +0100 List-Id: Discussion related to /etc/rc.d design and implementation List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-rc List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-rc@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-rc@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.6.1 Content-Language: en-US To: Andre Albsmeier , rc@FreeBSD.org References: From: Mateusz Piotrowski <0mp@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: Different PATHs in /etc/rc and /etc/rc.shutdown In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4KHsPN1Hrpz3MKs X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of mpp302@gmail.com designates 209.85.208.53 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=mpp302@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-0.93 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:209.85.128.0/17:c]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[rc@freebsd.org]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[FreeBSD.org]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(1.00)[1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[209.85.208.53:from]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.93)[-0.931]; MLMMJ_DEST(0.00)[rc]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[0mp@FreeBSD.org,mpp302@gmail.com]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_POSSIBLE(0.00)[209.85.208.53:from]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:209.85.128.0/17, country:US]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[0mp@FreeBSD.org,mpp302@gmail.com]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com] X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N Hi, On 15/03/2022 09:21, Andre Albsmeier wrote: > Today I was bitten by the fact that /etc/rc.shutdown and /etc/rc set different > PATHs (I used a command sitting in /usr/local/sbin w/o specifying its path > and it worked in stop_cmd() but not in start_cmd()): > > /etc/rc.shutdown: PATH=/sbin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/usr/local/sbin > /etc/rc: PATH=/sbin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin > > Is there a reason for this? Or should they be made equal? In the latter case > I will file a PR... > > -Andre > It seems it's been like that since 1997: https://cgit.freebsd.org/src/commit/?id=8889c700f314bb2d6fc652ff I'd say that /usr/local/sbin should not be included in the PATH of /etc/rc.shutdown for consistency, but then this behavior is almost 20 year old now. In the end, I'd that /usr/local/sbin should not be there and perhaps it should be gone for FreeBSD 14.0. Best, Mateusz Piotrowski