From nobody Mon Sep 16 14:42:58 2024 X-Original-To: questions@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4X6nhV0CZjz5WB5h for ; Mon, 16 Sep 2024 14:43:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lumiwa@dismail.de) Received: from mx2.dismail.de (mx2.dismail.de [159.69.191.136]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA512) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4X6nhS6djVz46Kf for ; Mon, 16 Sep 2024 14:43:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lumiwa@dismail.de) Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=dismail.de header.s=20190914 header.b=WJ7BS47R; dmarc=pass (policy=reject) header.from=dismail.de; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of lumiwa@dismail.de designates 159.69.191.136 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=lumiwa@dismail.de Received: from mx2.dismail.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx2.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 42d5c52f for ; Mon, 16 Sep 2024 16:43:02 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=dismail.de; h=date:from :to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=20190914; bh=LmdHFxBk bme1kLQdjBeXYl1qlm3wclrg5nvoOi9mxx8=; b=WJ7BS47RI7IoNhfSONjBeRSW DXBWgCqkKzIb53U/L3eW/LJFJJz/iTagKBKORM4z/60Rpy6B0mm3bdZ9u1lYdS3a bsJ4wsvEtfS6RKUfUPyoqNWULoT0jkaSVFJ4MTSgEV1Jf+KUI6IblDaKTmpVAWBr zJMlvWljc8lpL0miXBeZGSK6szrY84YG6AtAgQ9LvtWPsa/tRegJpvh6ySmyACey OQTdACQLgStIClQtWJJmhd0sKuWvMjwRipGDYZsOxW42Ddbwc6xto6mqS66B/FIO eKLHXexjjf1z5ikMdazaea4QURGqiYzBSZdXKgh/puetFZ2nEYvxc0cUUOFvcg== Received: from smtp1.dismail.de ( [10.240.26.11]) by mx2.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 43201441 for ; Mon, 16 Sep 2024 16:43:01 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp1.dismail.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp1.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id a06574eb for ; Mon, 16 Sep 2024 16:43:01 +0200 (CEST) Received: by dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id c96090e8 (TLSv1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256:NO) for ; Mon, 16 Sep 2024 16:43:00 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2024 10:42:58 -0400 From: LuMiWa To: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Suggestions for mail client Message-ID: <20240916104258.367e66e5@dismail.de> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.21.0 (GTK+ 2.24.33; amd64-portbld-freebsd14.0) List-Id: User questions List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-questions List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spamd-Bar: ----- X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-5.70 / 15.00]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; DWL_DNSWL_LOW(-1.00)[dismail.de:dkim]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-0.997]; RCVD_DKIM_ARC_DNSWL_MED(-0.50)[]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[dismail.de,reject]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:159.69.191.136]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED(-0.20)[159.69.191.136:from]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[dismail.de:s=20190914]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:24940, ipnet:159.69.0.0/16, country:DE]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; MLMMJ_DEST(0.00)[questions@freebsd.org]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[questions@freebsd.org]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[dismail.de:+] X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4X6nhS6djVz46Kf On Mon, 16 Sep 2024 11:45:08 +0200 Andrea Venturoli wrote: > Hello. >=20 > I've been a progressively unhappier ThunderBird user for almost the > last 20 years; the upgrade to 115 brough a general slowness (with > specific big troubles in some areas), but I resisted. > Unfortunately 128 is truly unusable: moving from one folder to > another or from one message to another takes seconds (so just > skimming the messages on FreeBSD mailing lists is now taking tenfolds > the time it did until a week ago), resizing the message pane takes > about 5 seconds, marking 50 messages as read takes close to one > minute, etc...). >=20 > Don't get me wrong, I still like ThunderBird (altough with a lot of=20 > criticism), but unless there's a compiler switch (LTO?) or something=20 > else that can bring TB back to the speed it had a couple of years > ago, it's time to move on to something else. >=20 >=20 >=20 > In the port tree I see Evolution, Geary, KMail, Sylpheed and possibly=20 > others I might have missed. > I read several comparison but came up with no clear winner; of course > I could try them all, but it would take days of work. > So I'm asking here for a suggestion... >=20 >=20 > What I absolutely need: > _ close to perfect IMAP support; > _ IMAP tags/labels; > _ multiple accounts: I've got more than 50, although I use less than > 10 daily and I could leave the other 40 in ThunderBird for occasional > use; _ online only/no local storage (for some accounts) *and* local > cached messages (for others); > _ support for big folders (in the GBs size and or 10k messages); > _ CardDAV support; > _ good searching; > _ performance, stability, future support, etc... >=20 > What I'd like: > _ newsgroups support; > _ RSS; > _ CalDAV (these three I could eventually achieve with other programs,=20 > still...): > _ possibly not locking in into some desktop environment (currently I > use XFCE); > _ ability to read HTML mail (altough I never write such a thing). >=20 > What I don't care about: > _ message filters; > _ antispam (as I manage them both server side); > _ "modern" interface. >=20 > Any hint? >=20 > bye & Thanks > av. >=20 I am using claws mail: https://www.claws-mail.org/faq/index.php/General_Information --=20 =E2=80=9CI hate books; they only teach us to talk about things we know noth= ing about.=E2=80=9D =E2=80=95 Jean-Jacques Rousseau=20