From nobody Tue Sep 10 05:05:20 2024 X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4X2s8v2LdNz5Wj8j for ; Tue, 10 Sep 2024 05:05:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fernando.apesteguia@gmail.com) Received: from mail-lf1-x12f.google.com (mail-lf1-x12f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::12f]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "WR4" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4X2s8t56j5z54hX for ; Tue, 10 Sep 2024 05:05:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fernando.apesteguia@gmail.com) Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none Received: by mail-lf1-x12f.google.com with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-53653ff0251so6013881e87.0 for ; Mon, 09 Sep 2024 22:05:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1725944733; x=1726549533; darn=freebsd.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=ZLimJ6jPMj+fcl6N1OsdIZIDTYkCSh4XoZfw/cIODpU=; b=GZotqYZjOPwWjKa/A2GA49HyTMQVcIZaxi+IfW5mEYZ6rvAWHsH7fDb8WUEBXlUT4k 7/0VYbwSqP75dLQsLOO67tfMAx33tgqyCvQqkH2MgE1avSJIOFaA7vVwBiupxTV35KH6 4gZ4Vch1MAHnLKWlylTpa7u4iletXsADVhANcvwUjKvCYlsF8eG+30+OjEhLnty8jtkF BuXlYBKDymGxBRKUjMLEDw7zaSMt5ICgL4kvdFei8+/V3JHfGBRjSWyvUCYE6asmSc3L BaV+Nkwg/DAo4/hirwCXxXkv5pyzRiPOvm4zbmtU77+GzvESGRAjRdaB+cXmZ8eE47cn BlcA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1725944733; x=1726549533; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=ZLimJ6jPMj+fcl6N1OsdIZIDTYkCSh4XoZfw/cIODpU=; b=CNfRK2+rlIG31ZzWc2aLq7eq1uzrPXm/cI8sjsqyXWSyaoQVfu3iLVnB70r9aN4mIW f8vibgb5gtebF7aB8Oph4vd5qthzMuUWzyEL9T+5LVzbLbXMSYgDbWXCYQcQfSB9T64r IETMhSep89Cw+OFnX7yt2QL4DwFk/VccsXDOonKnSyufOKbcjdrm4t4IgV2ZqArdKIrL 4A9M/43+EOFPqrb4gvWkafNvRR5NbBuWHwpbPV3yenknEMXBgpJRzHTN8cDjeHUh5XoZ BV4ynO2E0PKR99SVSN4Xel+NJODzvjvpzTm779fq0WQxgkXS2/71FqqNIHYNtoIVLWiS A3YQ== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCWHP/uFfHNNanPk6nhaYZ4ACcYEmnEXREoHhEz1nzKYiz4+bSL7FmVkRtnoVi5hbRCJ/l+Had4oqjJmiV0FX84kyw==@freebsd.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxBnoEzanPLH9exJnwuNZT9NPQqp2+lnHuyryml1NcnrNDbuRn/ CkV7nMy8ysaGMegCujVChRmiELzzgy1aOusZcLlg88cDF5T1RHp+mDaYmWOhjOaN4JKw9gE3kdw zzMOnztWssXcAuROGi9pxKu0CMv3I6YI/ X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEia+oFFYlAGcW++tcfIzcFB9QjuEFE5T8lYuvUsCu3UOdIR53mFYM1W0pXh6aYKYs3gu5SiM/1Z5fXiUCbCQY= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:12c1:b0:52e:9382:a36 with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-536587b902bmr8101977e87.30.1725944732545; Mon, 09 Sep 2024 22:05:32 -0700 (PDT) List-Id: User questions List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-questions List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: =?UTF-8?Q?Fernando_Apestegu=C3=ADa?= Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2024 07:05:20 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Listing packages built for a random release/architecture To: Kevin Oberman Cc: Tomek CEDRO , User Questions Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000af7e3e0621bcd220" X-Spamd-Bar: ---- X-Rspamd-Pre-Result: action=no action; module=replies; Message is reply to one we originated X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[]; TAGGED_FROM(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2a00:1450::/32, country:US] X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4X2s8t56j5z54hX --000000000000af7e3e0621bcd220 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable El mar, 10 sept 2024, 0:49, Kevin Oberman escribi=C3= =B3: > > > On Mon, Sep 9, 2024 at 2:10=E2=80=AFPM Fernando Apestegu=C3=ADa < > fernando.apesteguia@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> >> On Mon, Sep 9, 2024 at 8:58=E2=80=AFPM Kevin Oberman wrote: >> >>> >>> For amd64 V14.?, you can go to >>> https://pkg-status.freebsd.org/beefy22/jail.html?mastername=3D140amd64-= defaultThis >>> is a list of all builds for 14. (Packages are always built for the olde= st >>> supported minor release of each major version. Minor updates must not b= reak >>> the system ABI, so 14.0 builds should work for all V14 systems. The >>> exception is kernel modules which get messy, but not binutils. >>> >>> Unfortunately, builds on hte new Chicago build systems are no linger >>> ordered by time, but by hash. The last build is highlighted yellow, but= it >>> will likely not include all packages, so you have to find the last few >>> builds and walk back over them to find binutils. Fortunately, binutils >>> was updated in the latest build completed yesterday. For cases where yo= u >>> need ot go back, here is a list of the most recent builds for 140amd64: >>> f550157a18a4 >>> 46b3743b8460 >>> 50625859d806 35743 >>> 60a177caf143 5734 >>> ff9b1b7bdb15 750 >>> ac90984a4ba1 1649 >>> 1963f6d23107 9924 >>> 3efa6621722c 14528 >>> b3cf46924d98 10287 >>> a760f6876277 1307 >>> 935c61ac4bff 3346 >>> 15d22e1c70da 9178 >>> 1b6eada811a7 3353 >>> 59e63aec278e 11646 >>> 94b089c7ad30 5477 >>> b9994ae18767 35841 >>> 13f486017d78 19763 >>> >>> Newest at the bottom. the second column is the number of packages built >>> in the build. >>> >>> I really hope that this is improved! >>> >> >> Thanks! >> This is what I was looking for. >> >> Now, how do you exactly go from https://pkg-status.freebsd.org/ to >> https://pkg-status.freebsd.org/beefy22/jail.html?mastername=3D140amd64-d= efault >> ?? >> Because in the main page, if I filter in "Package Builds" using the text >> box at the right, and type "140", I get 15 entries, and none of them has >> the 13f486017d78 >> >> hash for the build. >> In addition if I click on >> >> 59d8804dcdd7 >> >> and try to go to the poudriere build, my system can not reach >> http://gohan02.nyi.freebsd.org/build.html?mastername=3D14stable-amd64-qu= arterly-baseline&build=3D59d8804dcdd7 >> >> Cheers. >> > > Since the new builders are in Chicago, it's not surprising > gohan02.nyi.freebsd.org > > does not get you there. ATM, this is a bit of a mess. I hope it will be > fixed, the pkg-status does not yet talk to the new Chicago systems, so th= e > last build in New York will be the last that shows up directly on > pkg-status. As far as I can tell, only 140amd64 is no a new builder. I do > see one build of 140i386-default on beefy21. Looks like 14amd64-monthly > might be headed for beefy20, but it doesn't seem to be loading now, so i= t > might not be production, yet. > > Wish I could be more helpful, but I just poke around and see what I can > find. > You were very helpful. Thanks for the information --=20 > Kevin Oberman, Part time kid herder and retired Network Engineer > E-mail: rkoberman@gmail.com > PGP Fingerprint: D03FB98AFA78E3B78C1694B318AB39EF1B055683 > --000000000000af7e3e0621bcd220 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


El mar, 10 sept 2024, 0:49, Kevin Oberman <rkoberman@gmail.com> escribi=C3=B3:<= br>
<= div class=3D"gmail_default" style=3D"font-family:tahoma,sans-serif;font-siz= e:small">

On Mon, Sep 9, 2024 at 2:10=E2=80=AFPM Fernando Apestegu= =C3=ADa <fernando.apesteguia@gmail.com> wrote:


On Mon, Sep 9, 2024 at 8:58=E2=80=AFPM Kevin Oberman <r= koberman@gmail.com> wrote:

For amd64 V14.?, you= can go to https://pkg= -status.freebsd.org/beefy22/jail.html?mastername=3D140amd64-defaultThis= is a list of all builds for 14. (Packages are always built for the oldest = supported minor release of each major version. Minor updates must not break= the system ABI, so 14.0 builds should work for all V14 systems. The except= ion is kernel modules which get messy, but not binutils.

Unfortunately, builds on hte ne= w Chicago build systems are no linger ordered by time, but by hash. The las= t build is highlighted yellow, but it will likely not include all packages,= so you have to find the last few builds and walk back over them to find bi= nutils. Fortunately, binutils
was updated in the latest build completed yesterd= ay. For cases where you need ot go back, here is a list of the most recent = builds for 140amd64:
f550157a18a4
46b3743b8460
50625859d806 35743
60a177caf= 143 5734
ff9b1b7bdb15 750
ac90984a4ba1 1649
1963f6d23107 9924
3= efa6621722c 14528
b3cf46924d98 10287
a760f6876277 1307
935c61ac4bf= f 3346
15d22e1c70da 9178
1b6eada811a7 3353
59e63aec278e 11646
9= 4b089c7ad30 5477
b9994ae18767 35841
13f486017d78 19763

Newest at the bottom. the s= econd column is the number of packages built in the build.

I really hope that this is i= mproved!

Thanks!
= This is what I was looking for.

Because in the ma= in page, if I filter in "Package Builds" using the text box at th= e right, and type "140", I get 15 entries, and none of them has t= he 13f486017d78 hash= for the build.
In addition if I click on 59d8804dcdd7 and try to go to the poudriere build, my = system can not reach http://gohan02.nyi.freebsd.org/build.html= ?mastername=3D14stable-amd64-quarterly-baseline&build=3D59d8804dcdd7

Since the new builders are in Chicago, it's not surp= rising gohan02.nyi.freebsd.org does not get you there. ATM= , this is a bit of a mess. I hope it will be fixed, the pkg-status does not= yet talk to the new Chicago systems, so the last build in New York will be= the last that shows up directly on pkg-status. As far as I can tell, only = 140amd64 is no a new builder. I do see one build of 140i386-default on beef= y21.=C2=A0 Looks like 14amd64-monthly might be headed for beefy20, but=C2= =A0 it doesn't seem to be loading now, so it might not be production, y= et.

Wish I could be more helpful, but I = just poke around and see what I can find.

You were very he= lpful.
Thanks for the information=C2=A0

--
<= div>
Kevin Oberman, Part time kid her= der and retired Network Engineer
E-mail: rkoberman@gmail.com
PGP Fingerprint: D03FB98AFA78E3B78C1694B318AB39EF1B055683
--000000000000af7e3e0621bcd220--