Re: mount SMB
- In reply to: Erwan David : "Re: mount SMB"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Wed, 04 Sep 2024 19:50:53 UTC
On Wed, 4 Sep 2024, Erwan David wrote: > On Wed, Sep 04, 2024 at 10:27:03AM CEST, Nikos Vassiliadis <nvass@gmx.com> said: >> >> >>> Sent: Monday, September 02, 2024 at 1:18 PM >>> From: "infoomatic" <infoomatic@gmx.at> >>> To: questions@freebsd.org >>> Subject: Re: mount SMB >>> >>> beware: mount_smbfs only supports protocol version 1, which is hardly >>> used any more. Modern systems have been using versions 3.11+ for a long >>> time now. I have been hoping for an upgrade for a long time already >> >> Hi, >> >> Exactly. I didn't mention it but that is problem. I haven't even tried >> to use the native solution as it's a bad idea and I am pretty sure it >> won't work anymore... >> >> It seems that smbnetfs is the only way to mount a contemporary SMB share. > > rclone might also be a solution > smb connections are only used to make files, printers, named pipes, and other network resources on a windows host available to FreeBSD workstations on a LAN. Security, at least for us, is not an issue as no user has a password. smb is all used for IPC communications. Any issues from this can be handled by a fire wall. In our setup no host on the LAN is exposed to the internet. Doug