Re: wireguard confusion

On 10/8/24 10:46, fatty.merchandise677@aceecat.org wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 07, 2024 at 08:45:33PM GMT, Kyle Evans wrote:
> 
>>> Little nitpick at this, can't you exclude wg from the port then?
> 
>> At this point we probably could- all supported versions should have
>> it- but I have no opinion.  CC decke@
> 
> Note that the rc bit would have to be modified in that case, as it
> hardcodes the pathname to /usr/local/bin/wg.
> 

That can be fixed.

> If anything, I'd do something to the base copy -- if not delete it,
> maybe rename it, how about wgtool ?
> 

I can't think of a good reason to do this, no.  You should be using the 
version in base, not the version in ports.

Thanks,

Kyle Evans