From nobody Tue Oct 08 15:46:24 2024 X-Original-To: questions@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4XNL3S0H7Gz5ZXVX for ; Tue, 08 Oct 2024 15:46:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fatty.merchandise677@aceecat.org) Received: from beesty.loosely.org (beesty.loosely.org [IPv6:2600:3c01:e000:4c0::2]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4XNL3Q5GD8z3wmH for ; Tue, 8 Oct 2024 15:46:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fatty.merchandise677@aceecat.org) Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of fatty.merchandise677@aceecat.org designates 2600:3c01:e000:4c0::2 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=fatty.merchandise677@aceecat.org; dmarc=none Received: from [::1] (helo=beesty ident=itz) by beesty.loosely.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98-4-9cb179d48) (envelope-from ) id 1syCPo-000000001sN-2zA0 for questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 08 Oct 2024 08:46:24 -0700 Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2024 08:46:24 -0700 From: fatty.merchandise677@aceecat.org To: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: wireguard confusion Message-ID: Mail-Followup-To: questions@freebsd.org References: <29044f1d-f835-459d-8e1c-17832580b5d9@FreeBSD.org> <20241008024304.5ff138a9@Hydrogen> <4e50caf7-dd15-4c8c-9a69-b2f7dbee8b46@FreeBSD.org> List-Id: User questions List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-questions List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4e50caf7-dd15-4c8c-9a69-b2f7dbee8b46@FreeBSD.org> X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.18 / 15.00]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-0.999]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-0.999]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.98)[-0.981]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; ONCE_RECEIVED(0.10)[]; RCVD_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; ASN(0.00)[asn:63949, ipnet:2600:3c01::/32, country:SG]; MISSING_XM_UA(0.00)[]; FROM_NO_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[aceecat.org]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; MLMMJ_DEST(0.00)[questions@freebsd.org]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[] X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4XNL3Q5GD8z3wmH X-Spamd-Bar: --- On Mon, Oct 07, 2024 at 08:45:33PM GMT, Kyle Evans wrote: > > Little nitpick at this, can't you exclude wg from the port then? > At this point we probably could- all supported versions should have > it- but I have no opinion. CC decke@ Note that the rc bit would have to be modified in that case, as it hardcodes the pathname to /usr/local/bin/wg. If anything, I'd do something to the base copy -- if not delete it, maybe rename it, how about wgtool ? -- Ian