Re: Building a ported kernel module, where the Project-provided package is inferior (was: Error report on FreeBSD-14.2-BETA2 - graphics problem)
- Reply: Graham Perrin : "drm-61-kmod now packaged for 14.2 on AMD64; and enhancements to freebsd-update (was: Building a ported kernel module, where the Project-provided package is inferior)"
- In reply to: Graham Perrin : "Building a ported kernel module, where the Project-provided package is inferior (was: Error report on FreeBSD-14.2-BETA2 - graphics problem)"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2024 02:10:08 UTC
> On Nov 17, 2024, at 4:38 PM, Graham Perrin <grahamperrin@gmail.com> wrote: > > On 14/11/2024 11:09, Hans Ottevanger wrote: >> … rebuilding the drm-61-kmod package …. I still wonder what we have to tell an unsuspecting (possibly beginning) end user … > > The need to build modules such as drm-61-kmod is: > > * very frequently encountered > > * not mentioned at <https://docs.freebsd.org/en/books/faq/>. > > When the announcement for BETA3 is posted to Reddit: > > * I'll add a hint that FreeBSD-src-sys can be added with pkg > > – for the benefit of people who might not want the relative complexity of things such as git, gitup, and got. > > Fernando made enhancement [1] to freebsd-update(8) so that end users will be warned / hinted. So maybe it is time to MFC that to stable branches ? The serial of related commits are [2] [3] and [4]. 1. https://reviews.freebsd.org/D39695 <https://reviews.freebsd.org/D39695> 2. bc0c6c9cf3a9 freebsd-update: Add check for kernel modules 3. d3b6d70e0dfa freebsd-update(8): Use kern.module_path 4. d76ef58d566c freebsd-update: Correctly check if pkg(8) is present Best regards, Zhenlei