Re: dma: could not pick up queue file
- In reply to: Dan Langille: "Re: dma: could not pick up queue file"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2024 13:39:36 UTC
On Sun, Nov 10, 2024 at 07:37:58AM -0500, Dan Langille wrote: > On Tue, Nov 5, 2024, at 3:35 PM, Daniel Tameling wrote: > > On Sun, Nov 03, 2024 at 08:58:21AM -0500, Dan Langille wrote: > >> > >> Based on that, I'll add this to /etc/periodic.conf: > >> > >> # disable queuerun_enable to avoid conflict with dma > >> daily_queuerun_enable="NO" > >> > >> That comment is just to remind me what it's for. > >> > >> Now it's just a matter of time. If there are no more incidents, I say you've solved it. Let's give it a few weeks. > >> > >> Thank you. Good job. :) > > > > Thanks. If something is running automatically that isn't started by > > cron, periodic is always a good candidate. > > > > Btw.: there still is a dma port and its pkg-message says: > > > > And you can disable some sendmail specific daily maintenance routines in your > > /etc/periodic.conf file: > > > > daily_clean_hoststat_enable="NO" > > daily_status_mail_rejects_enable="NO" > > daily_status_include_submit_mailq="NO" > > daily_submit_queuerun="NO" > > That is a good find. Perhaps that should be added to the FreeBSD man page / docs for dma. For those following along at home, this is a good way to get more involved with the FreeBSD project. > Sorry for the late reply, I have been busy the last few days. I actually think that it's more than a documentation issue. If this solves the issue, the defaults for periodic should be changed; dma has now replaced sendmail and it feels like this fell through the cracks. Even if this doesn't solve the problem, I don't think everything is working as intended. You should probably file a bug so that somebody more knowledgeable can have a look. Best regards, Daniel