Re: dma: could not pick up queue file

From: Daniel Tameling <tamelingdaniel_at_gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2024 13:39:36 UTC
On Sun, Nov 10, 2024 at 07:37:58AM -0500, Dan Langille wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 5, 2024, at 3:35 PM, Daniel Tameling wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 03, 2024 at 08:58:21AM -0500, Dan Langille wrote:
> >> 
> >> Based on that, I'll add this to /etc/periodic.conf:
> >> 
> >> # disable queuerun_enable to avoid conflict with dma
> >> daily_queuerun_enable="NO"
> >> 
> >> That comment is just to remind me what it's for.
> >> 
> >> Now it's just a matter of time. If there are no more incidents, I say you've solved it. Let's give it a few weeks.
> >> 
> >> Thank you. Good job. :)
> >
> > Thanks. If something is running automatically that isn't started by 
> > cron, periodic is always a good candidate.
> >
> > Btw.: there still is a dma port and its pkg-message says:
> >  
> >   And you can disable some sendmail specific daily maintenance routines in your
> >   /etc/periodic.conf file:
> >  
> >   daily_clean_hoststat_enable="NO"
> >   daily_status_mail_rejects_enable="NO"
> >   daily_status_include_submit_mailq="NO"
> >   daily_submit_queuerun="NO"
> 
> That is a good find.  Perhaps that should be added to the FreeBSD man page / docs for dma. For those following along at home, this is a good way to get more involved with the FreeBSD project.
> 

Sorry for the late reply, I have been busy the last few days.

I actually think that it's more than a documentation issue. If this solves the issue, the defaults for periodic should be changed; dma has now replaced sendmail and it feels like this fell through the cracks. Even if this doesn't solve the problem, I don't think everything is working as intended. You should probably file a bug so that somebody more knowledgeable can have a look. 

Best regards,
Daniel