Re: Upgrade 8.4-STABLE to 14-STABLE
- Reply: Edward Sanford Sutton, III: "Re: Upgrade 8.4-STABLE to 14-STABLE"
- In reply to: Edward Sanford Sutton, III: "Re: Upgrade 8.4-STABLE to 14-STABLE"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2024 11:00:51 UTC
On Sat, Jan 27, 2024 at 12:59 PM Edward Sanford Sutton, III < mirror176@hotmail.com> wrote: > On 1/27/24 00:55, Odhiambo Washington wrote: > > Is there a way to upgrade 8.4-STABLE to 14-STABLE, or even change it to > > 14-RELEASE? > > Hopefully others have better things to say or a more brief summary, > but for now... > "Maybe" other ways work but from a build+install source approach I > presume the intended way was to build then install the most up to date > 8-STABLE, then 9-STABLE, etc. until you are on 14-STABLE. Where > mergemaster used to be used for cvs & svn updates, etcupdate became a > thing and I think required once you are on versions only available > through git; you will need to run etcupdate starting with a source tree > matching the currently installed version before updating the source tree > as you start to use it. I do not recall what versions introduced or > required it but it is required when working from a git source repository > instead of cvs/svn. > Binary packages require you start and end with a more formal release > such as 13.2-RELEASE (or whatever last 13 release was) => 14.0-RELEASE. > If using ZFS, my understanding is that binary updates across major > versions seem to be painfully slow. You would need to switch to and > install the nearest -RELEASE version. If using a custom kernel then you > would still be stuck building it from source but otherwise can use > binary updates for it too. > Obviously as there would be many updates+reboots happening with a # > of API revisions, I'd make sure 3rd party kernel modules that aren't > necessary for the update are not being loaded until after the updates to > FreeBSD + the modules are completed. For good measure, just shut down > unneeded software from startup, cron, etc. as the won't likely be API > compatible until reinstalled or compatibility libraries are installed. > Maybe it would be wise to consider 'replacing' the install instead of > binary updating if not for speed of its multiple steps alone. I presume > such drastic action is the only single step process but would be > interested if others have suggestions otherwise. > If you have ZFS as root and are planning to upgrade to newer > filesystem/pool versions (performed with zfs related commands, not with > source installs or FreeBSD's update tool), you should make sure you take > steps to upgrade the boot loader code before that operation is performed. > If you have backups, you always have a way to undo what has been done > in case anything goes wrong or doesn't work. /usr/src/UPDATING is also > wise to read/follow for any -STABLE user in addition to the -STABLE > mailing list. Nothing comes to mind of what to be aware of from it > despite that I probably have done that same upgrade path on the machine > I am typing this reply on though I migrated when each -STABLE branch was > new rather than old. I have not yet upgraded to 14 though. > 'Maybe' pkg switched through pkgng within this timeframe; it has a > database conversion process that you can go through though I think it > leaves behind the old data layout for you to manually dispose of. Could > also just uninstall 'all' packages then reinstall/replace with what is > now available once upgraded. Handbook at least used to talk of this > conversion which I 'think' was a thing around v9 or so. Tools can output > a list of installed packages including pkgng's `pkg prime-list` command > which can then help reinstall after a bulk removal and portmaster has a > documented set of steps which can aid in that too. > > And for a brief command summary and/or comments I'd use for source > upgrades (over and over and...modify as your system needs): > > cd /usr/src > #if using etcupdate for the first time, you must use its preparation > step before updating the source tree; see other documentation. > #update the source tree using git, svn, or whatever tool... > #git switch releng/14.0 > git switch stable/13 > #remove vendor branches; at least one of the updates has requires this > git remote prune origin > #update source tree with git > git pull --ff-only > #cleanup the build path; I had to perform this to even go from 13-STABLE > to 14-STABLE and have the build not fail, possibly because I accelerate > my updates by using things like 'WITH_META_MODE=yes' > chflags -R noschg /usr/obj/usr;rm -rf /usr/obj/usr;cd /usr/src&&make > cleandir&&make cleandir > #slower but more reliable build with a kernel install if successful > make buildworld&&make buildkernel&&make installkernel > #faster build, run in background, provide less output. This will hang if > PORTS_MODULES is used and a dialog comes up during any port build as > jobs count is incompatible with PORTS_MODULES + `make comfig` dialog boxes. > /usr/bin/nice -n 18 /usr/sbin/idprio 31 make -sj8 buildworld > buildkernel&&make installkernel > shutdown now > fsck -p > mount -u / > mount -a > sh /etc/rc.d/zfs start > cd /usr/src > #adjkerntz -i # if CMOS is not UTC > #mergemaster -iUFp #disabled as I use etcupdate now > etcupdate -p > cd /usr/src&&make installworld&&make delete-old&&etcupdate > shutdown -r now > > #These steps should only need to be done at the end. > #update bootcode for ZFS on root; UEFI requires different steps. This > must be done before zpool/zfs changes for bootable root pools. If the > partition is too small, this will fail; I stole swap space with > deletes+recreates to work past that. This should be repeated for every > disk that could be asked upon to boot the system. > gpart bootcode -b /boot/pmbr -p /boot/gptzfsboot -i 1 ada1 > #next up, upgrade/replace packages with up to date copies. I have used > different ways of doing this over time such as manually uninstalling > then running `make install clean` in a ports directory, simplified with > portupgrade and I was never a big user of portmaster as I found failures > of one sort or another too common and it aborts midtask on those, and > now currently use pkg form a custom built repository using poudriere. > #once packages are all updated one way or another > cd /usr/src;make delete-old-libs > Thank you very much for the detailed procedure. By the look of things, this is quite involving and I believe requires one to have the machine right next to them. I am not using ZFS at all. I was hoping there is a way to switch from STABLE to RELEASE and then just use freebsd-update. -- Best regards, Odhiambo WASHINGTON, Nairobi,KE +254 7 3200 0004/+254 7 2274 3223 In an Internet failure case, the #1 suspect is a constant: DNS. "Oh, the cruft.", egrep -v '^$|^.*#' ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ :-) [How to ask smart questions: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html]