Re: USB key && NTFS
- Reply: Alexander Burke : "Re: USB key && NTFS"
- In reply to: Alexander Burke : "Re: USB key && NTFS"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2024 13:40:07 UTC
On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 10:05:07PM +0100, Alexander Burke wrote: > > They meant 128 GiB, but somehow the `i` tends to avoid the printing process Wikipedia blames the IEC for this disparity, but I call it cheating. > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gigabyte#Definition > Hi, it's the other way round: for storage, manufactures generally use a conversion factor of 1000, which doesn't have the "i" in the unit. The "i" denotes a conversion factor of 1024, which leads to smaller numbers. However, omitting the "i" when using 1024 is also very common. The wikipedia article you linked has a little bit further down the following passage: "This means that a 300 GB (279 GiB) hard disk might be indicated variously as "300 GB", "279 GB" or "279 GiB", depending on the operating system." Best regards, Daniel