From nobody Tue Dec 03 07:54:12 2024
X-Original-To: questions@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1])
	by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Y2Xwt6ksmz5g1vZ
	for <questions@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org>; Tue, 03 Dec 2024 07:54:22 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from ml@netfence.it)
Received: from soth.netfence.it (mailserver.netfence.it [78.134.96.152])
	(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
	 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256
	 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256)
	(Client CN "mailserver.netfence.it", Issuer "R10" (verified OK))
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Y2Xws4Lhqz4Pdq
	for <questions@freebsd.org>; Tue,  3 Dec 2024 07:54:21 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from ml@netfence.it)
Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org;
	dkim=pass header.d=netfence.it header.s=202410 header.b=nsP12QOS;
	spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of ml@netfence.it designates 78.134.96.152 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=ml@netfence.it;
	dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=netfence.it
Received: from [10.1.2.18] (alamar.local.netfence.it [10.1.2.18])
	(authenticated bits=0)
	by soth.netfence.it (8.18.1/8.17.2) with ESMTPSA id 4B37sCFe060282
	(version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO)
	for <questions@freebsd.org>; Tue, 3 Dec 2024 08:54:12 +0100 (CET)
	(envelope-from ml@netfence.it)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=netfence.it;
	s=202410; t=1733212452;
	bh=f39LmNispSCKQwpCyX18bMFbeHeJTfvkjNms1/J2YZ4=;
	h=Date:Subject:To:References:From:In-Reply-To;
	b=nsP12QOS6E+VgcfJgQ4DT5x4VApYNQFocJTvgGngwQFXv7M19+JES0tbOvti+7LUe
	 q7RrinpzBDTXmZyxb9hJ5/EYdzk5OpU9mb/G47LndyfEy/srA2J9kSIDX3+eDHO2Kc
	 kUy0nLjaiOtKDx7rjwoKVJLXxT16Ah1azVUtKZD8=
X-Authentication-Warning: soth.netfence.it: Host alamar.local.netfence.it [10.1.2.18] claimed to be [10.1.2.18]
Message-ID: <3bc92b40-205f-4da1-ab9c-d3ae5bb5ab1a@netfence.it>
Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2024 08:54:12 +0100
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-questions
List-Help: <mailto:questions+help@freebsd.org>
List-Post: <mailto:questions@freebsd.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:questions+subscribe@freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:questions+unsubscribe@freebsd.org>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Subject: Re: postgresql 16
Content-Language: en-US
To: questions@freebsd.org
References: <6cKxpppDaTNpexhV@aceecat.org>
 <abc9e458-9305-40b0-bc58-ec1dd3d636dc@fechner.net>
From: Andrea Venturoli <ml@netfence.it>
In-Reply-To: <abc9e458-9305-40b0-bc58-ec1dd3d636dc@fechner.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.94 / 15.00];
	NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000];
	NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000];
	NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.95)[-0.952];
	DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[netfence.it,none];
	R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:78.134.96.152];
	R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[netfence.it:s=202410];
	MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain];
	XM_UA_NO_VERSION(0.01)[];
	RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1];
	ASN(0.00)[asn:35612, ipnet:78.134.0.0/17, country:IT];
	RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[];
	MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+];
	RCVD_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1];
	RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[];
	MLMMJ_DEST(0.00)[questions@freebsd.org];
	ARC_NA(0.00)[];
	FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[];
	HAS_XAW(0.00)[];
	MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[];
	FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[];
	TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[];
	TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[];
	PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[questions@freebsd.org];
	DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[netfence.it:+]
X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Y2Xws4Lhqz4Pdq
X-Spamd-Bar: ---

On 12/3/24 06:55, Matthias Fechner wrote:

> why not do a:
> 
> pkg upgrade

Maybe the OP is using 2024Q4 port tree?
PostgreSQL updates are often not MFH (even for security fixes).

  bye
	av.