From nobody Sun Aug 04 14:16:48 2024 X-Original-To: questions@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4WcM8912vXz5SPdC for ; Sun, 04 Aug 2024 14:16:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lumiwa@dismail.de) Received: from mx2.dismail.de (mx2.dismail.de [159.69.191.136]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA512) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4WcM87544Xz4glk for ; Sun, 4 Aug 2024 14:16:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lumiwa@dismail.de) Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=dismail.de header.s=20190914 header.b=rIuR1+fB; dmarc=pass (policy=reject) header.from=dismail.de; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of lumiwa@dismail.de designates 159.69.191.136 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=lumiwa@dismail.de Received: from mx2.dismail.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx2.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 9631d908 for ; Sun, 4 Aug 2024 16:16:52 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=dismail.de; h=date:from :to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=20190914; bh=E1RGnt1d m3NB2MmDYgY5ihh5dSExmb1ycgQwSpdnyhY=; b=rIuR1+fBhWABY3LEsOs8Kgop nnLboqQtSYb689WcMM9HJ49Z9t2AxAaPwhI8k27LB2Oa+nEpTWFzhj6yxe3dufPh NRYLQw5nJux+NLweDU4XNQRPDesjN3lPwUwEoivxVh0lj6q6A+2IJU2oP3C4aJkW PjRnz+NqhN42TXioeyvuSd00qol0tfbHCPrOQC3YUJSIRONnQ1wFLcaN775iF9Hb +PvCQ3YShI/prE1m1oXbQZaFP+i+FQNfwmp9agC3U8hhpncJjIYy2zOAmUOwL5fj LzIAKUModlN5B/RtZaix/T4Jx6vqIWQVDKvmyFMk3i9bpFU1ayNvkzlV8yQyhg== Received: from smtp1.dismail.de ( [10.240.26.11]) by mx2.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 77d9ecac for ; Sun, 4 Aug 2024 16:16:52 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp1.dismail.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp1.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 2ca7d23e for ; Sun, 4 Aug 2024 16:16:51 +0200 (CEST) Received: by dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id bfe0838f (TLSv1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256:NO) for ; Sun, 4 Aug 2024 16:16:51 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 4 Aug 2024 10:16:48 -0400 From: LuMiWa To: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: directory from 14.0 in 14.1 Message-ID: <20240804101648.2b73bcf4@dismail.de> In-Reply-To: <0e2af412-f983-4379-aa30-13022c9524bf@FreeBSD.org> References: <20240801184343.52c3e5be@dismail.de> <20240802101225.4228f6a6@dismail.de> <0e2af412-f983-4379-aa30-13022c9524bf@FreeBSD.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.21.0 (GTK+ 2.24.33; amd64-portbld-freebsd14.0) List-Id: User questions List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-questions List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spamd-Bar: ----- X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-5.62 / 15.00]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; DWL_DNSWL_LOW(-1.00)[dismail.de:dkim]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.92)[-0.918]; RCVD_DKIM_ARC_DNSWL_MED(-0.50)[]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[dismail.de,reject]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:159.69.191.136]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED(-0.20)[159.69.191.136:from]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[dismail.de:s=20190914]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:24940, ipnet:159.69.0.0/16, country:DE]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; MLMMJ_DEST(0.00)[questions@freebsd.org]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[questions@freebsd.org]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[dismail.de:+] X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4WcM87544Xz4glk On Sun, 4 Aug 2024 12:17:02 +0100 Matthew Seaman wrote: > On 02/08/2024 15:12, LuMiWa wrote: > > /usr/local/x86_64-portbld-freebsd14.0/bin/ar was installed by > > package binutils-2.40_6,1 >=20 > Package set are only built for each major branch. So you get the > same set of packages for 14.0 as 14.1. The packages are built on the=20 > earliest still-supported branch of each major version. So packages > for 14.0 and 14.1 release are being built on a 14.0 system. >=20 > This is reflected in the 'x86_64-portbld-freebsd14.0' classification=20 > used in many GNU tools. This is absolutely normal for packages to be=20 > used on 14.1-RELEASE. Everything is fine. >=20 > Cheers, >=20 > Matthew >=20 Thank you very much to everyone. --=20 =E2=80=9CI hate books; they only teach us to talk about things we know noth= ing about.=E2=80=9D =E2=80=95 Jean-Jacques Rousseau=20