From nobody Mon Apr 15 07:26:31 2024 X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4VHzJ700lFz5HxWr for ; Mon, 15 Apr 2024 07:26:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from list-freebsd-questions@jyborn.se) Received: from mailgate.leissner.se (mailgate.leissner.se [IPv6:2a02:920:3035::210]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mailgate.leissner.se", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4VHzJ56sC9z4jWC for ; Mon, 15 Apr 2024 07:26:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from list-freebsd-questions@jyborn.se) Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=pass (policy=quarantine) header.from=jyborn.se; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of list-freebsd-questions@jyborn.se designates 2a02:920:3035::210 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=list-freebsd-questions@jyborn.se Received: from mailgate.leissner.se (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailgate.leissner.se (8.17.1/8.17.1) with ESMTPS id 43F7QZWI073530 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 15 Apr 2024 09:26:35 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from list-freebsd-questions@jyborn.se) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by mailgate.leissner.se (8.17.1/8.17.1/Submit) id 43F7QZKr073529; Mon, 15 Apr 2024 09:26:35 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from list-freebsd-questions@jyborn.se) Received: from pol.leissner.se(192.71.29.17), claiming to be "pol-server.leissner.se" via SMTP by mailgate.leissner.se, id smtpd165C3F; Mon Apr 15 09:26:31 2024 Received: from pol-server.leissner.se (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pol-server.leissner.se (8.17.1/8.17.1) with ESMTP id 43F7QV0g070925; Mon, 15 Apr 2024 09:26:31 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from list-freebsd-questions@jyborn.se) Received: (from pol@localhost) by pol-server.leissner.se (8.17.1/8.17.1/Submit) id 43F7QVFP070924; Mon, 15 Apr 2024 09:26:31 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from list-freebsd-questions@jyborn.se) X-Authentication-Warning: pol-server.leissner.se: pol set sender to list-freebsd-questions@jyborn.se using -f Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2024 09:26:31 +0200 From: list-freebsd-questions@jyborn.se To: Pete Wright Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: small form factor router recommendations Message-ID: References: List-Id: User questions List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-questions List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by pol-server.leissner.se id 43F7QV0g070925 X-Spamd-Bar: --- X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.64 / 15.00]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.84)[-0.841]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[jyborn.se,quarantine]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2a02:920:3035::210]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; FROM_NO_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:12597, ipnet:2a02:920:3000::/36, country:SE]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MLMMJ_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; HAS_XAW(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_COUNT_FIVE(0.00)[5]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; MISSING_XM_UA(0.00)[] X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4VHzJ56sC9z4jWC On Fri, Apr 12, 2024 at 12:55:21PM -0700, Pete Wright wrote: >=20 > On 4/12/24 12:23, Lexi Winter wrote: > > i wrote: > >> i'm looking for an SFF or single-board computer that can run FreeBSD= , > >> for routing (FTTC, IPsec, Wireguard) on a home/soho network. >=20 > i'm very keen to learn about new vendors in this space too - just a=20 > couple notes on a few of the vendors mentioned. >=20 >=20 > > to summarise the various suggestions people made (thanks!): > > > > - Netgate : again fairly high > > prices, although lower than Protectli, but these seem to be design= ed > > specifically to run Netgate's software (pfSense) and i didn't see > > anything about support for generic FreeBSD. >=20 > i think it's worth noting that netgate is moving pfsense off of freebsd= =20 > and onto a linux.=A0 so long term ymmv in terms of paying the premium t= o=20 > have BSD support on their hardware unfortunately. i agree they were=20 > expensive and performance wasn't the best - but i was happy to pay the=20 > premium to support a freebsd based product. >=20 > https://www.netgate.com/blog/pfsense-software-embraces-change-a-strateg= ic-migration-to-the-linux-kernel Shocking news, but note the date on that page. :) Peter