From nobody Sat Oct 21 03:14:38 2023 X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4SC65F2zSZz4xMV6 for ; Sat, 21 Oct 2023 03:14:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pprocacci@gmail.com) Received: from mail-lj1-x234.google.com (mail-lj1-x234.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::234]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1D4" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4SC65D2DlKz4BLj for ; Sat, 21 Oct 2023 03:14:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pprocacci@gmail.com) Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none Received: by mail-lj1-x234.google.com with SMTP id 38308e7fff4ca-2c50ec238aeso21222571fa.0 for ; Fri, 20 Oct 2023 20:14:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1697858091; x=1698462891; darn=freebsd.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=Tidu8lGAwYY6CdNEcPqtiHXgOh5VzbC9U9C9iMGI0KU=; b=ELTl602JUKoeeWJmCoLCm18AXXnf8JxcsYpmVfgk5JpkvwG0drUCry5n9uzkKoZtby rrMLbsfdz8c3I1pzxkN3Uj+umWR2qT02zsNf3xT1EUcqgiNQEOiIR48qk5UMp8e6CrwP /+VAMivoAXkaG9vEoF78kHBL3+Guz4RqPmRG1v4FYz6nJ+DdTdq6qwv+OrRPkvsoy13g /EImHnGfVc76DJekoVjoDZHxO9/wGaNzVZImBlel6b8sWyBKMylf6WhmiJrikTPtOxj2 5fr4m2RUcJTejVDKGknvFCPNqphdpYkzlc+Wiwr2lYfRV/c7lfHbsIql1R8AurDvo0sG cXIA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1697858091; x=1698462891; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=Tidu8lGAwYY6CdNEcPqtiHXgOh5VzbC9U9C9iMGI0KU=; b=Mi1l6ZKRZcVFtNoUBiFQ833bFM62FuYQf7fXCo6X6J/Sls5yzmdDfW4nNN3yQI6kot fS+kGE2LQWxZWf6ViyhlCQ7LxyAMBGLXeByrshyvGys4vOP8CvHGCHW98zpz4ePfCX5o IC6q0/WN8v+ILcskyfWqCOjIlImdCZNWcFajSEYYmvANgQK9OAf6IIEuTKdb1Dla8/CS q5i5yZWuqd+bL5TV3yRylUplfQSiFqz6irfwcyqGn7+qFHnZqqfAhD8Cdo/ypSWVUu3Y 7J4zTX8o4lYP8tp4gqfNaKuxtzr6dmzL6VAP2ud25g7liUyGzJwFqoIVnU3JAG5ukAfc x2Cg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxVIU+Terkf06Vg3mVLdePTcRF6uq3F5HM6PLet775wUb8KS6FI oilY3oAyP4feQbcA8guFHcOzLAOWzEpauLcrmZyWCzQ= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEUGZPj+RRzXa/FUgsXQHUFuegYZ/hcoGVnExg+5JtY9HAQfrAH0cCbt/1KmRFxqOHh0wcuN6NZqdK+nBToKoc= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:3a15:0:b0:2c1:8a24:7afb with SMTP id h21-20020a2e3a15000000b002c18a247afbmr2202838lja.7.1697858090460; Fri, 20 Oct 2023 20:14:50 -0700 (PDT) List-Id: User questions List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-questions List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Paul Procacci Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2023 23:14:38 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: how to tell what options sendmail pkg was built with? To: William Dudley Cc: freebsd-questions Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000005c6a0a06083164a5" X-Spamd-Bar: ---- X-Rspamd-Pre-Result: action=no action; module=replies; Message is reply to one we originated X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2a00:1450::/32, country:US] X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4SC65D2DlKz4BLj --0000000000005c6a0a06083164a5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Oct 20, 2023 at 11:01=E2=80=AFPM William Dudley wrote: > I'm in sendmail hell again. Trying to fix broken sendmail because > libssl.so.11 disappeared, so my sendmail from ports died. > > > > I originally built it from ports to try to shut up this error from stock > sendmail: > > Warning: Option: AuthMechanisms requires SASL support (-DSASL) > Warning: Option: AuthOptions requires SASL support (-DSASL) > > It would be nice if one didn't have to go through the ports pageant > just to get a working sendmail. > > There's a sendmail pkg. How does one determine what options that > was built with, short of installing it and trying it? Is that documented > anywhere? The pkg command doesn't seem to have a way to query > for that information. > > Lots of googling has failed to turn up an answer. > > Thanks, > Bill Dudley > > This email is free of malware because I run UNIX. > --=20 __________________ :(){ :|:& };: --0000000000005c6a0a06083164a5 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


=
On Fri, Oct 20, 2023 at 11:01=E2=80= =AFPM William Dudley <wfdudley@gma= il.com> wrote:
I'm in sendmail hell again.=C2=A0 Trying to fix = broken sendmail because
libssl.so.11 disappeared, so my sendmail from p= orts died.



I originally built it from ports to try to= shut up this error from stock sendmail:

Warning: Option: AuthMechanisms requires SASL support (-DSA= SL)
Warning: Option: AuthOptions requires SASL support (-DSASL)

It would be nice if one didn't have to go through the p= orts pageant
just to get a working send= mail.

There's a sendmail pkg.=C2=A0 How does one determine what optio= ns that
was built with, short of instal= ling it and trying it?=C2=A0 Is that documented
anywhere?=C2=A0 The pkg command doesn't seem to have a way to = query
for that information.

Lots of g= oogling has failed to turn up an answer.

Thanks,
Bill Dudley

This email is free of malware because= I run UNIX.


--
_____________= _____

:(){ :|:& };:
--0000000000005c6a0a06083164a5--