Re: The port build failed claiming a runtime dependency on libmuffin.
- In reply to: Paul Mather : "Re: The port build failed claiming a runtime dependency on libmuffin."
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Wed, 10 May 2023 16:12:34 UTC
On 5/10/23 10:57 AM, Paul Mather wrote: > On Wed, 2023-05-10 at 10:21 -0400, Steven Friedrich wrote: >> On 5/10/23 9:51 AM, Steven Friedrich wrote: >>> On 5/9/23 11:45 AM, Andreas Perstinger wrote: >>>> On 09.05.23 17:34, Steven Friedrich wrote: >>>>> On 5/9/23 9:00 AM, Yuri wrote: >>>>>> Steven Friedrich wrote: >>>>>>> On 5/8/23 5:02 AM, Yuri wrote: >>>>>>>> The dependency is called x11-wm/muffin and it's recorded >>>>>>>> in >>>>>>>> x11/cinnamon/Makefile. >>>>>>> Respectfully, you're missing the point. How can libmuffin >>>>>>> be a >>>>>>> dependency when it's not in our ports tree? How does the >>>>>>> freebsd >>>>>>> team >>>>>>> build cinnamon? And why is a runtime dependency breaking a >>>>>>> build? >>>>>> Did you read my reply completely? Why - because it's not >>>>>> runtime-only >>>>>> dependency; try looking in the port Makefile. >>>>>> >>>>> STILL, libmuffin is not in the ports tree. >>>> Yuri is trying to tell you, that the port x11-wm/muffin provides >>>> libmuffin. >>>> >>>> The Makefile for x11/cinnamon, lines 18-19 [1]: >>>> >>>> LIB_DEPENDS= libcjs.so:lang/cjs \ >>>> libmuffin.so:x11-wm/muffin \ >>>> >>>> And pkg-plist for x11-wm/muffin, lines 229-231 [2]: >>>> >>>> lib/libmuffin.so >>>> lib/libmuffin.so.0 >>>> lib/libmuffin.so.0.0.0 >>>> >>>> Bye, Andreas >>>> [1] https://cgit.freebsd.org/ports/tree/x11/cinnamon/Makefile#n18 >>>> [2] >>>> https://cgit.freebsd.org/ports/tree/x11-wm/muffin/pkg-plist#n229 >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> Looks like I still don't understand. my meson log is attached. >>> >> OK, I manually built muffin, and cinnamon builds. I sent the build >> break log of cinnamon to gnome@freebsd.org > > Elsewhere in this thread you said you were tracking the quarterly > packages release, which is why x11-wm/muffin did not exist for you. > Presumably, you switched over to the "latest" track, which is what > enabled you to build libmuffin and hence cinnamon. > > How are you building your packages? Are you using a tool such as > Poudriere that ensures a clean environment is used, via jails, to build > packages, or are you building natively on your system with installed > system packages installed? If the latter, did you force-rebuild all > packages after switching from "quarterly" to "latest" to ensure there > were no stale/broken package dependencies? > > Cheers, > > Paul. No, sir. I am still just tracking 2023Q1 ports. I was wrong about muffin because I was looking for libmuffin. I re-read emails and then correctly went to x11-wm/muffin and built it. Then I was able to build x11/cinnamon. I am not building packages, per se. I am building ports at the cli. I sent my cinnamon build break to gnome@freebsd.org because cinnamon should have built muffin Thanks to all who have responded. Please forgive me, I have been away from freebsd for a couple years and I am doing things, virtualization, zfs, etc., that I've never done previously. -- FreeBSD freebsd.friedrich.org 13.2-RELEASE FreeBSD 13.2-RELEASE releng/13.2-n254617-525ecfdad597 GENERIC amd64