Re: Poudriere and Python FLAVORS
- In reply to: Olivier Certner : "Re: Poudriere and Python FLAVORS"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Fri, 07 Apr 2023 17:34:14 UTC
On Apr 7, 2023, at 10:36 AM, Olivier Certner <olivier.freebsd@free.fr> wrote: >> with BUILD_ALL_PYTHON_FLAVORS= yes Poudriere builds the py39 flavours of >> the packages (although the default version is 3.11) if no flavour is >> specified for a port. So it looks like I have to @py311 all my Python >> ports if I'm having a DEFAULT_VERSIONS+= python2=2.7 python3=3.11 python=3.11 > > Then most probably your 'make.conf' is not taken into account by poudriere. > > That said, some ports explicitly require Python 3.9 or less (e.g., openjdk11 => llvm12 => python39), but according to what you're saying, this is not the problem you're facing right now. This was the problem I was running into when trying to build ports locally with a default Python flavour of 3.10 when the FreeBSD default was 3.9. For some ports there would be some Python dependency that explicitly required a <3.10 version of Python. It's my understanding that when building a Python port of some given flavour, ALL the dependencies must support building that flavour. In other words, you can't, say, have a mixture of 3.9 and 3.10 dependent packages installed to fulfil a working 3.10 Python port: the port and all its dependencies must be 3.10. Cheers, Paul.