Re: Poudriere and Python FLAVORS
- Reply: Olivier Certner : "Re: Poudriere and Python FLAVORS"
- In reply to: Olivier Certner : "Re: Poudriere and Python FLAVORS"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Fri, 07 Apr 2023 14:45:10 UTC
On Fri, Apr 07, 2023 at 04:36:16PM +0200, Olivier Certner wrote: > > with BUILD_ALL_PYTHON_FLAVORS= yes Poudriere builds the py39 flavours of > > the packages (although the default version is 3.11) if no flavour is > > specified for a port. So it looks like I have to @py311 all my Python > > ports if I'm having a DEFAULT_VERSIONS+= python2=2.7 python3=3.11 python=3.11 > > Then most probably your 'make.conf' is not taken into account by poudriere. It looks like it is taken into account (if I can trust Poudriere output), see (1) (1) https://gist.github.com/silenius/3291e4bb5439a59d7684e9fe9a537ed7 > > That said, some ports explicitly require Python 3.9 or less (e.g., openjdk11 => llvm12 => python39), but according to what you're saying, this is not the problem you're facing right now. > > -- > Olivier Certner > > > -- Julien Cigar Belgian Biodiversity Platform (http://www.biodiversity.be) PGP fingerprint: EEF9 F697 4B68 D275 7B11 6A25 B2BB 3710 A204 23C0 No trees were killed in the creation of this message. However, many electrons were terribly inconvenienced.