Re: Poudriere and Python FLAVORS

On Fri, Apr 07, 2023 at 03:04:13PM +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote:
> On 07/04/2023 12:52, Julien Cigar wrote:
> > Hello,
> > 
> > I'm building 2023Q2 through Poudriere with:
> > DEFAULT_VERSIONS+= python2=2.7 python3=3.11 python=3.11 pgsql=13 php=8.1
> > 
> > I'm getting tons of "Ignored: Unknown flavor 'py39', possible flavors:
> > py311" (see (1)) for my Python ports (I didn't specified any flavor
> > @pyxx)
> > 
> > I don't understand why:
> > - Why does Poudriere tries to build @py39 flavor by default when 3.11 is the
> >    default?
> > - Why py39 flavor is unknown althoug the default Python version for
> >    2023Q2 is 3.9?
> 
> Do you have:
> 
> BUILD_ALL_PYTHON_FLAVORS= yes

no, I don't remember having read something about this knob.. is it
documented somewhere?

> 
> set in a make.conf file anywhere that poudriere could read? ie. somewhere
> under /usr/local/etc/poudriere.d ?
> 
> Equivalently some ports have a
> 
> USE_PYTHON= allflavors
> 
> setting which produces the same effect for just that port.  There's only
> about a dozen ports that do that in the whole tree, but they include some
> really commonly used ones like py-setuptools.
> 
> Either of those settings means poudriere will default to building modules
> for all python versions from 3.7 to 3.11 that are supported by the module.
> 
> If you only want version 3.11 of some modules, then you can add @3.11 to an
> individual port's path in the list you specify, and only that flavour will
> be built.
> 
> Note that if a port is not specified explicitly in your list of ports to
> build, but is automatically bought in to resolve dependencies for some other
> port, then it effectively has the @3.11 thing built in, even if the port has
> USE_PYTHON=allflavors set.
> 
> I don't see how you are getting "Unknown flavor 'py39'" though.  That means
> some port has somehow ended up with a dependency on eg. net/py-pysocks@py39
> which shouldn't happen.  Are you using a modified ports tree eg. with
> overlaid or locally modified ports?

no, it's the pristine clone of the 2023Q2 branch through git

> 
> 	Cheers,
> 
> 	Matthew
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 




-- 
Julien Cigar
Belgian Biodiversity Platform (http://www.biodiversity.be)
PGP fingerprint: EEF9 F697 4B68 D275 7B11  6A25 B2BB 3710 A204 23C0
No trees were killed in the creation of this message.
However, many electrons were terribly inconvenienced.