Re: pkg upgrade vs building from source
- Reply: doug : "Re: pkg upgrade vs building from source"
- In reply to: paul beard : "Re: pkg upgrade vs building from source"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Sun, 09 Oct 2022 06:25:14 UTC
On Sat, 8 Oct 2022 16:25:24 -0700 paul beard <paulbeard@gmail.com> wrote: > It would be best to rely on one or the other, to be sure. Pkg handles the > registration of ports/pkgs alike so not sure if I can query if a port was > built from source or as a pkg. I don't think I have installed many from > source, just postfix for certain. That may have been unduly hasty. One catch when mixing a few ports into a mostly package based setup is that the port build often builds dependencies which can then get used by packages installed later. The trick is to use make install-missing-packages before building (I used to use pkg install -A `make missing` before I discovered that). Then pkg lock the port. -- Steve O'Hara-Smith <steve@sohara.org>