Re: Tape, was Single User
- Reply: Kevin Oberman : "Re: Tape, was Single User"
- Reply: deleted: "deleted (X-No-Archive)"
- In reply to: John Levine: "Re: Tape, was Single User"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Thu, 19 May 2022 21:34:48 UTC
On 19 May 2022 20:49:51 -0000 "John Levine" <johnl@iecc.com> wrote: > The thing in the picture isn't paper tape, it's a 1/2" magnetic tape. > It looks relatively new, 1970s rather than 1950s so it is likely > recorded 9 bits across (8 plus parity) at a density of 1600 or 6250 BPI. I didn't look at the picture. That could be a *lot* harder to read even if you have a drive. I've heard tell of tapes that could only be read once due to storage damage rendering them more than a little fragile. -- Steve O'Hara-Smith <steve@sohara.org>