Re: Using a FreeBSD desktop was somehting about dog food
- In reply to: Steve O'Hara-Smith : "Re: Using a FreeBSD desktop was somehting about dog food"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2022 08:32:41 UTC
Hi, in my experiences paid developers of huge FLOSS desktop environment aren't willing to listen to users, while the unpaid developers of tools such as panels, file managers etc., that can be used with each lightweight window manager, are often much interested to listen to users. However, to report bugs or request features, we need to use the issue tracker of the projects, such as foo-panel's or bar-file-manager's Flyspray, GitHub and Co. thingy. And if you want, that they fix or add something for you, don't start you request with the desire for a migration from Flyspray to Bugfoo or GitHub to GitBar. For Linux and FreeBSD I recommend to avoid using KDE, GNOME and those huge desktop environments, but instead to consider using a lightweight window manager. There are a lot of lightweight window managers available and many tools that can be used with those window managers. My preferred window manager is openbox and my favourite file manager is ROXterm, but I replaced "ls" by "lsd". For me a command like "lsd" and the Tab-key is more comfortable than 30 mouse clicks to show the content of the same folder. However, some software requires a team of paid developers and a leadership. The team needs people with real world skills related to the domain. This kind of software is usually closed source running on proprietary operating systems only. Since FLOSS software often is based on other software, this easily becomes an issue. The prominent example is GTK. A lot of GTK based desktop software is excellent, but the developers are either struggling with discontinued GTK versions or need to rewrite the code constantly to migrate to the current GTK version. Regards, Ralf