Re: hardware recommendation
- In reply to: Robert Huff : "hardware recommendation"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2022 21:51:31 UTC
On 6/28/22 10:21, Robert Huff wrote: > > A disk drive on one of my machines is dying. > I'd like to replace it with a _reliable_ (the old one lasted 10+ > years at moderate loads) consumer-grade SATA II or higher drive of at > least 500 gbytes. > Any particular product lines getting consistantly good reviews? > And what should I avoid like flesh-eating bacteria? For OS drives, I keep the image small enough to fit onto a single "16 GB" device (HDD, SSD, USB, SDHC) and prefer 2.5" SATA III SSD's. I have been running new and used Intel SSD 520 Series 60 GB drives for several years, and none have failed. For data, I use 3.5" SATA III HDD's in pairs and add them as mirrors to ZFS pools. I have been running new, old model Seagate Constellation ES.2 3 TB HDD's for several years. One of ten failed prematurely. For backup devices, I have been running HGST Ultrastar DC HC310 3.5" SATA III 6 TB HDD's for about a year. So far, no problems. In my SOHO file server, I use the leftover space on the OS SSD as a ZFS cache for the data pool. The Media_Wearout_Indicator on this particular SSD is dropping 1% to 2% per year, which is noticeably faster than every other OS SSD. David