Re: zero filling a storage device (was: dd and mbr)
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2022 17:10:21 UTC
On Fri, 14 Jan 2022 18:00:39 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote: >Hi, > >zero filling is fishy for several reasons. It's never secure! >However, I won't comment zero filling. I'm not an expert and to lazy to >search for links. > >Related to the addressable blocks and real physical locations I've got >a link at hand. > >On Fri, 14 Jan 2022 15:55:58 +1100, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote: >>proof of the contrary > >Due to >https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wear_leveling >the only way that could be (but not necessarily is) secure, is a secure >erase command provided by the firmware. > >Regards, >Ralf PS: IIRC SSDs provide more disk space under the hood, than accessible by a user. So you can't outwit wear leveling by overwriting the complete disk. Probably it's still better to overwrite the complete accessible disk space, than not to do so.