Re: best software for managing multiple freebsd & linux machines ?

From: Russell L. Carter <rcarter_at_pinyon.org>
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2021 03:25:12 UTC
Hi David,

On 10/10/21 17:37, David Christensen wrote:
> On 10/10/21 15:26, Russell L. Carter wrote:
>> I use a single machine to keep host specific files git vc'd, 
> 
> 
> One Git project per host, or one Git project for everything?

I don't think it matters, does it?  I just use one for now.
I make a flat set of OS dirs, then underneath each
of those the OS specific hostnames.  That way I can share common
OS assumptions, included in the lower sh(1) scripts.

> 
>> and then I just write scripts
> 
> 
> What scripting language(s)?

sh(1)

> 
>> for tasks and rsync them over and execute them from the config box via 
>> ssh.
> 
> So, the configuration of each host is determined by installation (e.g. 
> full configuration) followed by a sequence of task scripts (e.g. 
> differential configuration)?

Yes, this is basically what something like salt does under the hood.

So things like postfix/dovecot or postgresql or yadifa/unbound
are going to need a bunch of post install actions.  You can write them
in the CMS DSL or you can write them in whatever you like.  I detest
sh(1) for anything complex, but realized that simple sh(1) is
just fine for almost everything in configuration space.

> 
> What if a script fails?

Fail stop.  A failure needs a postmortem, and then a response.
Best to halt on first failure.

> 
> Rollback?

I thought this might be important when I was starting out but for my
non-mission-critical stance, I rely on fail stop.

I ought to state explicitly that watching py-salt fail,
made me realize that rollback only works if you have the resources to
do 2-phase deployment.  You've got to vet that the deployment will
(should?) succeed in a test environment first.  Could be live, but it's
still a test environment.  I should also add that rollback is
part of an audited infrastructure, and no, the overhead of that
is something that I am not going to worry about as the sole
person responsible for my infrastructure.  Add significant
money and of course it is required.

> 
> 
> Idempotentcy?

Cattle, not pets?  Yeah, I do care about this.  Things like sysrc(8)
are helpful here, but I still don't have a good password file
management story.  Basically I bring a big hammer to the job if
it looks complex:  if things fail, stop.  Triage and then fix
the script(s), and then restart from the beginning.

> 
> Do you record what scripts have run for each host, and the outcome?

I should; when I have been paid to make things succeed, I always did.
But for my personal systems, nope, fail stop, then triage.  Never had
a reason to regret that.  I did regret all the time on py-salt, before
I rebuilt using the lessons it taught me.

> 
> How do you determine the configuration of a host at some point in the past?

That's what the git repo is for.

> 
> What if you perform configuration tasks by hand?

I think this is a great idea when you're just starting out, or you are
deploying a new software configuration, etc.  Automate what you already
understand.

Great questions!  HTH,
Russell

> 
> David
>