Re: editors/ghostwriter 24.12.0 versus x11/kde5
Date: Wed, 01 Jan 2025 18:50:50 UTC
On 01/01/25 17:53, Tomoaki AOKI wrote: > On Wed, 1 Jan 2025 16:05:19 +0000 > Graham Perrin <grahamperrin@gmail.com> wrote: > >> First noted on CURRENT (below, abbreviated), then with latest packages >> for 14.2-RELEASE (<https://pastebin.com/raw/rzqJAkUt>). >> >> Avoidable by locking ghostwriter-24.02.2 :-) >> >> <https://github.com/FreeBSD/freebsd-ports/commit/3c946a45d311a3e41712cbb5c6550878e564ac50> >> >>> … now only supports qt6 … Upstream decided to only support it [1] [2] The port can only reflect upstream development. I held some updates in the last few months because those were crashing for me and I was not able to fix it. This version is not crashing. I'm not using KDE/KF[56], but I do use ghostwriter with qt6 and some other applications with qt6/kf6 dependencies. > > Just my opinion as a user. > > Basically ports depend on kf* ports should NOT switch to Qt6 until KDE5 > is remaining as defaut KDE on FreeBSD. The exceptions would be: > > *KDE6 ports themselves, > *Security fix is available only for KF6 versions upstream. > > Unless the second reason, if upstream stops support building with kf5, > ports should be stick with currently in-tree version and wait for KDE6 > to be default on ports. Don't see a good reason to force everyone to use an old version. Anyway the ports tree is open source, nothing stops anyone from proposing (with himself as maintainer) a new port for the old version calling it "ghostwriter-qt5" or whatever. [1] https://invent.kde.org/office/ghostwriter/-/blob/release/24.12/CMakeLists.txt#L21 -- Guido Falsi <madpilot@FreeBSD.org>