From nobody Wed Feb 05 15:39:17 2025 X-Original-To: ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Yp4Cz3wrgz5mwbQ for ; Wed, 05 Feb 2025 15:39:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lumiwa@dismail.de) Received: from mx2.dismail.de (mx2.dismail.de [159.69.191.136]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA512) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Yp4Cy3lsnz3nvx for ; Wed, 05 Feb 2025 15:39:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lumiwa@dismail.de) Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=dismail.de header.s=20190914 header.b=omyAPuud; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of lumiwa@dismail.de designates 159.69.191.136 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=lumiwa@dismail.de; dmarc=pass (policy=reject) header.from=dismail.de Received: from mx2.dismail.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx2.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 381a183b for ; Wed, 5 Feb 2025 16:39:23 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=dismail.de; h=date:from :to:subject:message-id:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; s=20190914; bh=rGUxf0umKRhCsKqQK53MO tox/HQWIa+nF5x3WAbyDAk=; b=omyAPuudl37dBZMOVY8whLqeXtKGkdFQ4oiPQ NXWGaaMb375UT0v9w4pSyBTc4LV9Z0HH/XHCeHn4wC4OoykPpL/aXJNXEyJ+OrZs cxgTkBgUE+xerxWxIbrVMCzIjKkiVLeKHcRGMSHS0u2P9gsQuRfw68AGypusZqXa xIBc1HHa1knKYwJYL4N+uOml1BmMkTKSyETI4jzifrtoqnVEkFPZpLmPg/RABfx1 g+Fn88ARQMPMxkMvV7+awZv/fq9t5AcLwmBEFC5/X6NZqaRwlBxVTTAd0yjNktTv W25CDCJQCPTrxFqQpdZQ7Cw4kt5zOIu7mBlXEQDmNoRhH2VFQ== Received: from smtp2.dismail.de ( [10.240.26.12]) by mx2.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 521b7187 for ; Wed, 5 Feb 2025 16:39:22 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtp2.dismail.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp2.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 3cc813b0 for ; Wed, 5 Feb 2025 16:39:22 +0100 (CET) Received: by dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 61c17cca (TLSv1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256:NO) for ; Wed, 5 Feb 2025 16:39:22 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2025 10:39:17 -0500 From: LuMiWa To: FreeBSD Ports Subject: luakit-devel Message-ID: <20250205103917.287b64a3@dismail.de> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.21.0 (GTK+ 2.24.33; amd64-portbld-freebsd14.1) List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-5.70 / 15.00]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; DWL_DNSWL_LOW(-1.00)[dismail.de:dkim]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-0.999]; RCVD_DKIM_ARC_DNSWL_MED(-0.50)[]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[dismail.de,reject]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[dismail.de:s=20190914]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED(-0.20)[159.69.191.136:from]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:159.69.191.136]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:24940, ipnet:159.69.0.0/16, country:DE]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; MLMMJ_DEST(0.00)[ports@freebsd.org]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[ports@freebsd.org]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[dismail.de:+] X-Spamd-Bar: ----- X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Yp4Cy3lsnz3nvx Hi! In ports are luakit which has maintainer and luakit-devel which ports@freebsd.org is maintainer (it has no maintainer). Luakit was not updated 8 years but development version has all the time something improved, corrected... My suggestion is that we should keep just luakit-devel version. Thank you. --=20 =E2=80=9CLife is really simple, but we insist on making it complicated.=E2= =80=9D =E2=80=95 Confucius