Re: Strange version inconsistency in Samba t* utils (e.g. talloc)
- Reply: Tomoaki AOKI : "Re: Strange version inconsistency in Samba t* utils (e.g. talloc)"
- Reply: Yasuhiro Kimura : "Re: Strange version inconsistency in Samba t* utils (e.g. talloc)"
- Reply: Yasuhiro Kimura : "Re: Strange version inconsistency in Samba t* utils (e.g. talloc)"
- In reply to: Tatsuki Makino : "Re: Strange version inconsistency in Samba t* utils (e.g. talloc)"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Sun, 02 Feb 2025 09:17:35 UTC
Hi Tatsuki ! > The following two lines exist in INDEX-*. > > tdb-1.4.9,1|/usr/ports/databases/tdb|/usr/local|Trivial > Database|/usr/ports/dat... > tdb-1.4.10,1|/usr/ports/databases/tdb1410|/usr/local|Trivial > Database|/usr/port... > > I haven't checked which one takes precedence, but I guess it's bad that > package-name is duplicated. I understand, but samba is really picky with their "satellite" libraries. When you don't use them as embedded tools then you can have strange results if the version it not the one needed. For example, net/samba420 needs tdb >= 1.4.10, but other net/samba may not work with this version. This is very unfortunate but also some other tools like sssd2 and sudo may need this libraries as external when compiled with samba support. Kind regards, Xavier