From nobody Thu Sep 05 17:09:13 2024 X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4X05SC72PCz5WQgv for ; Thu, 05 Sep 2024 17:09:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@freebsd.org) Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::24b:4]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org", Issuer "R10" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4X05SC6Yt8z460X; Thu, 5 Sep 2024 17:09:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@freebsd.org) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1725556155; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=2HRoymVLuiuxB7bm+Ii06EZCE7c2Ttur8BSYDhu5eew=; b=gGlTn1ai2MTWholjQ5g8SJTBf2PJNPk+S6P3A3AyiEstJlmiog3KiPonrOuUrO2LC6xskS qb6kiEz+XHa39tzanVVP433OwXPk5o8k4xX5Yn2xTievYABaFkovACpmeGUig5czIISSJ4 1Kv1PLJW7rfnqLsII+EUovVVs2wRqVfnWUJcjzR+SVAY/XDhqt3aOKOFkC7Q6UXjlKGdRq PqXi2ko24PU+BNfN9xYM2yV1vIOMFN26pbzPha4X+mcSoyQ3jUQ7cRUHKIquDVO4POB9mu obcp2Ean9BCpralhvSboMV7ff93cv91DVcYAf/phws74ZlBUIS7gWotedJa0VA== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=freebsd.org; t=1725556155; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=tUO+xAQarFfQHwrwHeYimvWpjYmZVdEp0N+HK+qw9LQB7uMsMAUsC/Z4qRX42qJ5J+h7nw 0kzzzcSbpqee3H4JJklayL0pSu9X3bQKGSRZHc7ZTRSXViV3+lq/zyxCxlIImkj9JAPysx CH8Eez7hCRA9Hb9g4lAQPy2UoJOAl9tZRv8eImQIbZgtWUiDPDXypoIpNUlEkMK0G5fKAj hfzBZluviifujKmZUE6ejx9DECBMEkrD71UEaXzGj01htOljjqLECYFYsDqPacWMtQM6eS fX78HB1H2ndtSTZOm9hQ7t5bhxA+OjtI+ljghIm7ojWl9TITA+nQFDjbHGXL6g== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx1.freebsd.org; none ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1725556155; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=2HRoymVLuiuxB7bm+Ii06EZCE7c2Ttur8BSYDhu5eew=; b=Hru6RPw7GRtLahhoc7XtaNr24o6YgQ4rCe8FGuF+J9I0OH/GlR8xjTg8quAVF3BN0bXkQR uUPMWkg+RbBh+pIzSJIOv8j8vwAiV48KyKK9PRRiCdFPk79w+wUz4VTX3u2OqZnRb4P6/x Qo1+sX6fJivfHsK9OD4okSwt7M2U/3pYq3bMhMoT1CY/Lzn4pp8Srsi0kaVSr7Lxp5hSGt PXTkSV1BHNHGv8jc7X6k+nRHyzEWcN9J1fr07HJgWzgRtophFT/rUbiZoozg9c7XMIQQuI X6nSQbg73kymhwgI3jGFGQkm4zws65DgptUhw8XwJpNXOl7qYvYr0+FwR/wvCg== Received: from ltc.des.dev (unknown [IPv6:2a01:e0a:386:9c20:922e:16ff:fef1:acef]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: des) by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4X05SC5QqXz1DTp; Thu, 5 Sep 2024 17:09:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@freebsd.org) Received: by ltc.des.dev (Postfix, from userid 1001) id DDC5ABEE65; Thu, 05 Sep 2024 19:09:13 +0200 (CEST) From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= To: Roger Marquis Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: openssh-portable-9.8 vs inetd In-Reply-To: <53s17573-03n7-750p-869n-9q83r2o8po97@mx.roble.com> (Roger Marquis's message of "Thu, 5 Sep 2024 09:36:05 -0700 (PDT)") References: <53s17573-03n7-750p-869n-9q83r2o8po97@mx.roble.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Date: Thu, 05 Sep 2024 19:09:13 +0200 Message-ID: <868qw62fk6.fsf@ltc.des.dev> List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Roger Marquis writes: > Heads-up regarding openssh-portable 9.8 which doesn't work when called > from inetd.conf. Is there perhaps a better patch for sshd.c than simply > commenting the path test? Have you considered simply specifying the full path to sshd in inetd.conf? DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@FreeBSD.org