From nobody Fri Oct 25 15:05:24 2024 X-Original-To: ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4XZmLj1Scqz5ZnLy for ; Fri, 25 Oct 2024 15:05:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from uzsolt@freebsd.org) Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [96.47.72.83]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org", Issuer "R10" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4XZmLj0nNCz4Syw; Fri, 25 Oct 2024 15:05:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from uzsolt@freebsd.org) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1729868749; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=+j0UclVm/pRZ+dCb9H/UP1FkD0SnvjmzOo1dkJLec7E=; b=MK/STzp7Sd2JKJ5NKqV+AYLsAqVon5rYUb2K+s4u8LjzwwhVsZ2otE+bAP5csW8CpuY7ld 0CoIoO4RfkUsDU+fxU0IjHRSl+PK6WJJkuGKAn6fTQh3q+2TMjkSTeEPl0vQtdeVyevEGC bNlhu6CezozdIevQEqfSiGDB4g4I5BKip+AWUr6GS7ZaY6bdYCAC/MtL1u0Q4cFzgFV2gb ZhB1VyGRdHy7ylZSAutQXyL18JbdJEhGi+jDdwcRTItfVBCKBJkAJ5mh9TOJ4UBOrKT/RE e+4aIX9wpxqJuMI4qISqbNw2Xd/waAjIdFLMKXBsPqP4uCGn2ZoMcsz5ZG1Hyw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1729868749; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=+j0UclVm/pRZ+dCb9H/UP1FkD0SnvjmzOo1dkJLec7E=; b=xnd5Ec5Bhdxtaa6K74x0j1uD8xuvc9CG7ePL+qXtvB4fj7uPn+yw3vhB6BNcqWXaYTki3D QTwSBURhIFPVAxyqRl0VzUVKHuYZF6OO1DA2xRSdj7JNKTpH4l9sNinIdASifHrZV9z/r7 VelLhB/C42fUHKCqok7rMMtwAu4pHWXVOPyUqU407/JXnwwaftPpVf3i7IH1EB3hie0cL4 /lSwUq/pAdHQzvOhSantevN+Ykb+Fbt9n535JLT3hHATh7Zue/f42p3pazXYaTwmh+0Ufa JqBv54lNe4SS/a0shKOD2zSLwtg7G3B2c0xoMx27lhTC9PuLIA1X1uh/ZJ86UQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx1.freebsd.org; none ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=freebsd.org; t=1729868749; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=gKn48WZsAyVZVLq7IWJn6j8kqm2i8SyLbm9/6L/sZhgBSCe8uKZ3gozGMgU9CyUQHu0gt8 IXa1FPeXbrr3hTSma8nVbDz8T8xYhLqpA9d1gxzR/r82h3Y0n5EERDEo67/IJdCYasNUBl /+adnjEuKFgDu3fmzDWLMS6eFQbOP5JFP2KIiHI4UVDOfWH5izALCNXNtspq4E0OXxFC5c 96FTdjMrXEcBpQn50qF5zZfNV7ItBh2DSz2eFyI9XqKob80XX7D6JYfWoeAirozwcy9Y2N R0ZP9lxQS8NRNKIEqeLrJ5M39AnQLQK0IM3WvoKi880R860s6qoQMn6l/XKrvw== Received: from bsd-zsolt (87-97-9-194.pool.digikabel.hu [87.97.9.194]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: uzsolt/mail) by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4XZmLh3TbYz123L; Fri, 25 Oct 2024 15:05:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from uzsolt@freebsd.org) Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2024 17:05:24 +0200 From: Zsolt Udvari To: Jason Bacon Cc: ports-committers@freebsd.org, ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Delete port if it contains a bigger port? Message-ID: References: List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Thu, Oct 24, 2024 at 07:12:16AM -0500, Jason Bacon wrote: > On 10/24/24 04:01, Zsolt Udvari wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I have a question: there is a port, textproc/lacheck and it contains > > lacheck binary. But the print/texlive-base contains it too, and > > textproc/lacheck has CONFLICTS_INSTALL. > > > > I would delete it but I'm curious about your opinion. The lacheck > > doesn't have maintainer but there is a PR > > (https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=282121) to update it > > (and take maintainership). > > Are they actually the same program, or different programs with the same > name? Does textproc/lacheck do anything that the lacheck command in > texlive-base doesn't do? The new PR introduce new MASTER_SITES (TEX_CTAN/systems/texlive/${TEXLIVE_YEAR}) which is same in the print/texlive-base. So they do exactly same. Cheers, Zsolt