From nobody Wed Nov 06 15:28:50 2024 X-Original-To: ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Xk8Hn3T8Cz5chnP for ; Wed, 06 Nov 2024 15:28:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fuz@fuz.su) Received: from fuz.su (fuz.su [IPv6:2001:41d0:8:e508::1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "fuz.su", Issuer "fuz.su" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Xk8Hm4YMQz4KVW; Wed, 6 Nov 2024 15:28:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fuz@fuz.su) Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of fuz@fuz.su designates 2001:41d0:8:e508::1 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=fuz@fuz.su; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed), No valid DKIM" header.from=freebsd.org (policy=none) Received: from fuz.su (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fuz.su (8.18.1/8.18.1) with ESMTPS id 4A6FSoxH013712 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 6 Nov 2024 16:28:50 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from fuz@fuz.su) Received: (from fuz@localhost) by fuz.su (8.18.1/8.18.1/Submit) id 4A6FSo5a013711; Wed, 6 Nov 2024 16:28:50 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from fuz) Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2024 16:28:50 +0100 From: Robert Clausecker Cc: ports@freebsd.org, portmgr@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [RFC] New ports category "fs" Message-ID: References: List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-0.89 / 15.00]; MISSING_TO(2.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-0.999]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.99)[-0.993]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[fuz@freebsd.org,fuz@fuz.su]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+a]; DMARC_POLICY_SOFTFAIL(0.10)[freebsd.org : SPF not aligned (relaxed), No valid DKIM,none]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; MISSING_XM_UA(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:16276, ipnet:2001:41d0::/32, country:FR]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; FREEFALL_USER(0.00)[fuz]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; MLMMJ_DEST(0.00)[ports@freebsd.org]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[fuz@freebsd.org,fuz@fuz.su]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[] X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Xk8Hm4YMQz4KVW X-Spamd-Bar: / The new category has been committed as "filesystems" following portmgr approval and review. https://cgit.freebsd.org/ports/commit/?id=6e2da9672f79f44048d597f0f61e4646cdeade9d Thank you all for participating in this process. If you are a maintainer of one of the moved ports and would like to move your port back, you can find the individual commits that make up this move on this branch: https://github.com/clausecker/freebsd-ports/tree/fs-unsquashed Yours, Robert Clausecker Am Sun, Sep 29, 2024 at 03:09:09AM +0200 schrieb Robert Clausecker: > Greetings! > > I have just submitted a pull request adding a new category "fs" > for file systems and file system utilities to the ports collection. > See Github for the full patch set: > > https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd-ports/pull/302 > > If desired, I can submit this as a DR or PR as well. > > The new category is populated with some 126 ports (that's more than > x11-clocks!) that look like they might be file-system related. > > I was motivated to add this new category when I noticed that many > FUSE file systems were shipped as ports named sysutils/fusefs-$foo, > making sysutils/fusefs- a pseudo-category for FUSE filesystems. > If that's the (anti) pattern, why not make it offical and add a > true category for file system ports? Turns out there are a lot more > than one might think. > > I hope that with this move, we can reduce the load on devel and > sysutils (the two most popular misspellings of misc) and make > file-system related ports easier to find. > > For a full list of affected ports, see the list of commits attached > to the pull request. If you would like to not have your port moved > to fs, please comment or send me an email. > > I would like to kindly ask portmgr to discuss adding the new category > and give approval for me to do so. > > Yours, > Robert Clausecker > > -- > () ascii ribbon campaign - for an encoding-agnostic world > /\ - against html email - against proprietary attachments -- () ascii ribbon campaign - for an encoding-agnostic world /\ - against html email - against proprietary attachments