From nobody Sat May 04 07:11:23 2024
X-Original-To: ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1])
	by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4VWf3n1TQtz5K23j
	for <ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org>; Sat,  4 May 2024 07:11:33 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from pi@freebsd.org)
Received: from fc.opsec.eu (fc.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200:4::4])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4VWf3m4Dv6z4TYy
	for <ports@freebsd.org>; Sat,  4 May 2024 07:11:32 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from pi@freebsd.org)
Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org;
	none
Received: from pi (uid 104)
	(envelope-from pi@freebsd.org)
	id 222bf
	by fc.opsec.eu (DragonFly Mail Agent v0.13+ on fc.opsec.eu);
	Sat, 04 May 2024 09:11:23 +0200
Date: Sat, 4 May 2024 09:11:23 +0200
From: Kurt Jaeger <pi@freebsd.org>
To: henrichhartzer@tuta.io
Cc: Ports <ports@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: Taking over net/ndisc6, or adding it to src?
Message-ID: <ZjXfm8GJHK6yapuM@fc.opsec.eu>
References: <Nx0XGDT--3-9@tuta.io>
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports
List-Help: <mailto:ports+help@freebsd.org>
List-Post: <mailto:ports@freebsd.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:ports+subscribe@freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ports+unsubscribe@freebsd.org>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <Nx0XGDT--3-9@tuta.io>
X-Spamd-Bar: ----
X-Rspamd-Pre-Result: action=no action;
	module=replies;
	Message is reply to one we originated
X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00];
	REPLY(-4.00)[];
	ASN(0.00)[asn:12502, ipnet:2001:14f8::/32, country:DE]
X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4VWf3m4Dv6z4TYy

Hi!

> I see that net/ndisc6 doesn't have a maintainer.
> As a long time user of the tool, I'd be happy to take it over.

The way to do this:

- create a patch to update it to 1.0.8
- set yourself as maintainer with that patch
- submit the patch via bugs.freebsd.org
- Post the PR link here

> That said, I was wondering if this package might be a candidate for src? It's tiny and useful.

Why would it be needed in src instead of ports ?

-- 
pi@FreeBSD.org         +49 171 3101372                  Now what ?