Re: I've started collecting tmpfs usage figures from a poudriere-devel bulk -a for later publishing some of the top ones (handy for TMPFS_BLACKLIST judgments)

Hello,

Mark Millard <marklmi@yahoo.com> escreveu (quarta, 1/05/2024 à(s) 03:09):

> # grep TMPFS: mmjnk-bulk-a-output.txt | sort -n -r -k11 | head -84
> [1D:10:04:32] [25] [02:14:20] Finished  www/chromium |
> chromium-124.0.6367.60: Success ending TMPFS: 31.76 GiB
> [19:30:44] [13] [00:21:40] Finished  databases/clickhouse |
> clickhouse-22.1.3.7: Success ending TMPFS: 31.06 GiB
> [1D:20:43:30] [01] [00:19:06] Finished  lang/rust-nightly |
> rust-nightly-1.79.0.20240317: Success ending TMPFS: 28.86 GiB
> [1D:04:12:07] [06] [00:16:49] Finished  lang/rust | rust-1.77.0: Success
> ending TMPFS: 27.35 GiB
> [1D:17:19:08] [01] [01:14:40] Finished  www/iridium |
> iridium-browser-2024.01.120_1: Success ending TMPFS: 25.66 GiB
>

I've stoped using TMPFS because of long variety of ports that I test and
because I'm limited on 16GB ram.

I'm thinking if a dynamic control could exist to put ports on
TMPFS_BLACKLIST when a limit is reached?

What are your thoughts?

Cheers,


-- 
Nuno Teixeira
FreeBSD UNIX:  <eduardo@FreeBSD.org>   Web:  https://FreeBSD.org