Re: pkg upgrade odity
- In reply to: Baptiste Daroussin: "Re: pkg upgrade odity"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Thu, 02 May 2024 07:54:16 UTC
Am 2024-05-02 09:33, schrieb Baptiste Daroussin: > 2 mai 2024 à 09:28 "Alexander Leidinger" <Alexander@leidinger.net> a > écrit: > > > >> >> Am 2024-05-01 09:52, schrieb Baptiste Daroussin: >> >> > >> > Le 30 avril 2024 23:30:16 GMT+02:00, Alexander Leidinger > <Alexander@Leidinger.net> a écrit : >> > >> > > >> > > Am 2024-04-30 23:11, schrieb Baptiste Daroussin: >> > > >> > >> > Le 30 avril 2024 22:51:19 GMT+02:00, Alexander Leidinger >>> <Alexander@Leidinger.net> a écrit : >> > >> > Am 2024-04-30 22:21, schrieb Baptiste Daroussin: >> > >> > Le 30 avril 2024 13:18:41 GMT+02:00, Alexander Leidinger >>>>> <Alexander@Leidinger.net> a écrit : >> > >> > >>>>>> Does this sound like "pkg check -B" would help here? >> > >> > >>>>>> Bye, >> > >> > Alexander. >> > >> > >>>>> >>>>> Not at all! I need the output of pkg info -R --raw-format ucl >>>>> abseil >> > >> > >>>> Output attached. >> > >> > >>>>> This is a real issue on your system, which usually comes from local >>>>> building, is it your case? >> > >> > >>>> It is my own build with poudriere-devel on another system, not build >>>> form ports on the system where the package was installed. The main >>>> differences to the official FreeBSD packages are WITH_PIE, >>>> WITH_BIND_NOW and WITH_RELRO (at least for abseil, some other ports >>>> may have some options like WITHOUT_X11). >> > >> > >>>> Bye, >> > >> > Alexander. >> > >> > >>> >>> So pkg is right your package does not provide anymore the libraries >>> mosh requires! >> > >> > >>> libabsl_strings is not in the provides. >> > >> > > >> > > >> On the poudriere builder: >> > > >> > > # tar -tvf >> /space/poudriere/data/packages/poudriere-bastille-default/All/abseil-20230125.3.pkg >> | grep libabsl_strings >> > > >> > > lrwxr-xr-x 0 root wheel 0 10 Apr. 00:22 >> /usr/local/lib/libabsl_strings.so -> libabsl_strings.so.2301.0.0 >> > > >> > > -rwxr-xr-x 0 root wheel 99600 10 Apr. 00:22 >> /usr/local/lib/libabsl_strings.so.2301.0.0 >> > > >> > > lrwxr-xr-x 0 root wheel 0 10 Apr. 00:22 >> /usr/local/lib/libabsl_strings_internal.so -> >> libabsl_strings_internal.so.2301.0.0 >> > > >> > > -rwxr-xr-x 0 root wheel 9536 10 Apr. 00:22 >> /usr/local/lib/libabsl_strings_internal.so.2301.0.0 >> > > >> > > >> Bye, >> > > >> > > Alexander. >> > > >> > > > > > The thing it means it is that some of the .so files from devel/abseil > are not generated in a way that prevents pkg from extracting the SONAME > properly which has a big change to come from one of your non default > option (unrelated to x11 because the port has no x11 option) >> > > >> > >> > So it highlights a real problem >> > >> >> I've rebuild the abseil package and reinstalled it on the system in >> question. It was rebuild with an updated poudriere-devel >> (poudriere-git-3.4.99.20240424). Now pkg check -d doesn't complain >> about missing stuff anymore, and the raw pkg info output lists >> libabsl_strings. >> >> Bye, >> >> Alexander. >> > > > Great, now the interesting part would be to know why the abseil package > had to be rebuilt in the first place, aka what was caussing the issue > either on the .so files themselves, or what potential bug of pkg was > trigger which made it unable to analyse properly those file. > > Do you have a copy of the abseil package with the wrong > shlibs_provides? > If yes I would love to be able to analyse it. Uh, oh.... no. I used rm, not mv before rebuilding. And no zfs snapshot of packages or a backup of /var/cache/pkg or poudriere-builds. And given that I see strange socket behavior on the -current system I could imagine (depending on how the package building is handled) that it may or may not be an issue inside pkg. Bye, Alexander. -- http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander@Leidinger.net: PGP 0x8F31830F9F2772BF http://www.FreeBSD.org netchild@FreeBSD.org : PGP 0x8F31830F9F2772BF