Re: pkg upgrade odity

Le 30 avril 2024 23:30:16 GMT+02:00, Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net> a écrit :
>Am 2024-04-30 23:11, schrieb Baptiste Daroussin:
>> Le 30 avril 2024 22:51:19 GMT+02:00, Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net> a écrit :
>>> Am 2024-04-30 22:21, schrieb Baptiste Daroussin:
>>>> Le 30 avril 2024 13:18:41 GMT+02:00, Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net> a écrit :
>>> 
>>>>> Does this sound like "pkg check -B" would help here?
>>>>> 
>>>>> Bye,
>>>>> Alexander.
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Not at all! I need the output of pkg info -R --raw-format ucl abseil
>>> 
>>> Output attached.
>>> 
>>>> This is a real issue on your system, which usually comes from local building, is it your case?
>>> 
>>> It is my own build with poudriere-devel on another system, not build form ports on the system where the package was installed. The main differences to the official FreeBSD packages are WITH_PIE, WITH_BIND_NOW and WITH_RELRO (at least for abseil, some other ports may have some options like WITHOUT_X11).
>>> 
>>> Bye,
>>> Alexander.
>>> 
>> 
>> So pkg is right your package does not provide anymore the libraries mosh requires!
>> 
>> libabsl_strings is not in the provides.
>
>On the poudriere builder:
># tar -tvf /space/poudriere/data/packages/poudriere-bastille-default/All/abseil-20230125.3.pkg | grep libabsl_strings
>lrwxr-xr-x  0 root   wheel       0 10 Apr. 00:22 /usr/local/lib/libabsl_strings.so -> libabsl_strings.so.2301.0.0
>-rwxr-xr-x  0 root   wheel   99600 10 Apr. 00:22 /usr/local/lib/libabsl_strings.so.2301.0.0
>lrwxr-xr-x  0 root   wheel       0 10 Apr. 00:22 /usr/local/lib/libabsl_strings_internal.so -> libabsl_strings_internal.so.2301.0.0
>-rwxr-xr-x  0 root   wheel    9536 10 Apr. 00:22 /usr/local/lib/libabsl_strings_internal.so.2301.0.0
>
>Bye,
>Alexander.
>


The thing it means it is that some of the .so files from devel/abseil are not generated in a way that prevents pkg from extracting the SONAME properly which has a big change to come from one of your non default option (unrelated to x11 because the port has no x11 option)

So it highlights a real problem

Best 
Bapt