Re: Proposed ports deprecation and removal policy

Le sam. 16 mars 24 à  9:28:23 +0100, Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz>
 écrivait :

> If you are asking to remove ports without maintainer, you are asking to
> remove 3458 ports right now, and many others depends on these unmaintained
> ports, so the impact will be much bigger.

Seconded! Ports without an identified maintainer are not "unmaintained".

E.g. the ports net/mpich and net/openmpi* are maintained by
ports@freebsd.org and I regularly maintain them: of course I could claim
their maintainership, by I don’t, because these are quiet complex ports,
and if other people need to modify them when I’m not available to review
their changes, I don’t want to block them.
-- 
Th. Thomas.