From nobody Fri Mar 15 07:14:21 2024 X-Original-To: ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4TwwVS1TvFz5CmKS for ; Fri, 15 Mar 2024 07:14:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) Received: from mail.rdtc.ru (mail.rdtc.ru [62.231.190.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4TwwVR4TXlz4dWr for ; Fri, 15 Mar 2024 07:14:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none Received: by mail.rdtc.ru (RDTC Post Office Server, from userid 1000) id B8B351CF38; Fri, 15 Mar 2024 14:14:29 +0700 (+07) Received: from eg.sd.rdtc.ru (eg.sd.rdtc.ru [62.231.161.221]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: egrosbein@rdtc.ru) by mail.rdtc.ru (RDTC Post Office Server) with ESMTPSA id B37751CC6E; Fri, 15 Mar 2024 14:14:28 +0700 (+07) X-Envelope-From: eugen@grosbein.net X-Envelope-To: grembo@freebsd.org Received: from [10.58.0.10] (dadvw [10.58.0.10]) by eg.sd.rdtc.ru (8.17.1/8.17.1) with ESMTPS id 42F7EPwm099053 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NOT); Fri, 15 Mar 2024 14:14:25 +0700 (+07) (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) Subject: Re: Proposed ports deprecation and removal policy To: Tomoaki AOKI , Daniel Engberg References: <7a7501f71442d27f6d8c1c0a16f247c1@mail.infomaniak.com> <7fd610fa25ffb9a4348aaadf7459a689@mail.infomaniak.com> <20240315072753.46ffa39e1bbb2e0996099cdf@dec.sakura.ne.jp> Cc: Michael Gmelin , Florian Smeets , ports@freebsd.org From: Eugene Grosbein Message-ID: Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2024 14:14:21 +0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0 List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20240315072753.46ffa39e1bbb2e0996099cdf@dec.sakura.ne.jp> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,LOCAL_FROM, NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_PASS,T_DATE_IN_FUTURE_96_Q,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=4.0.0 X-Spam-Report: * -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record * -2.3 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * 0.0 T_DATE_IN_FUTURE_96_Q Date: is 4 days to 4 months after Received: * date * 2.6 LOCAL_FROM From my domains * -0.0 T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE No description available. * -2.5 NICE_REPLY_A Looks like a legit reply (A) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 (2022-12-14) on eg.sd.rdtc.ru X-Spamd-Bar: ---- X-Rspamd-Pre-Result: action=no action; module=replies; Message is reply to one we originated X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:29072, ipnet:62.231.184.0/21, country:RU] X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4TwwVR4TXlz4dWr 15.03.2024 5:27, Tomoaki AOKI wrote: > How about setting NO_PACKAGE [1] to force admins to build from ports > by themselves for such risky but too usful to delete ports? Tools, not policy. Do not try to force people to do as you wish. Eugen