From nobody Tue Mar 12 14:15:49 2024 X-Original-To: ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4TvG0D02qYz5DvN9 for ; Tue, 12 Mar 2024 14:16:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) Received: from mail.rdtc.ru (mail.rdtc.ru [62.231.190.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4TvG0C4DN3z4lQK for ; Tue, 12 Mar 2024 14:16:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none Received: by mail.rdtc.ru (RDTC Post Office Server, from userid 1000) id 9DDBA1CF17; Tue, 12 Mar 2024 21:15:56 +0700 (+07) Received: from eg.sd.rdtc.ru (eg.sd.rdtc.ru [62.231.161.221]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: egrosbein@rdtc.ru) by mail.rdtc.ru (RDTC Post Office Server) with ESMTPSA id 3E6E31CC48; Tue, 12 Mar 2024 21:15:54 +0700 (+07) X-Envelope-From: eugen@grosbein.net X-Envelope-To: flo@FreeBSD.org Received: from [10.58.0.10] (dadvw [10.58.0.10]) by eg.sd.rdtc.ru (8.17.1/8.17.1) with ESMTPS id 42CEFpbe054699 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NOT); Tue, 12 Mar 2024 21:15:51 +0700 (+07) (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) Subject: Re: Proposed ports deprecation and removal policy To: Daniel Engberg References: <435edf7c-a956-4317-b327-3372de70dbef@FreeBSD.org> <1c5b7818-842f-f7b8-9d4e-5bf681cad20e@grosbein.net> <64c7435c-2d69-1f62-ba7c-30812860a457@grosbein.net> <9646fd5d0666c8e57795ea1b370b6af1@mail.infomaniak.com> Cc: Florian Smeets , ports@freebsd.org From: Eugene Grosbein Message-ID: Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2024 21:15:49 +0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0 List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <9646fd5d0666c8e57795ea1b370b6af1@mail.infomaniak.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,LOCAL_FROM, NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_PASS,T_DATE_IN_FUTURE_96_Q,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=4.0.0 X-Spam-Report: * -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record * -2.3 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * 0.0 T_DATE_IN_FUTURE_96_Q Date: is 4 days to 4 months after Received: * date * 2.6 LOCAL_FROM From my domains * -0.0 T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE No description available. * -3.1 NICE_REPLY_A Looks like a legit reply (A) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 (2022-12-14) on eg.sd.rdtc.ru X-Spamd-Bar: ---- X-Rspamd-Pre-Result: action=no action; module=replies; Message is reply to one we originated X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:29072, ipnet:62.231.184.0/21, country:RU] X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4TvG0C4DN3z4lQK 12.03.2024 3:24, Daniel Engberg пишет: [skip] > Another possible option would be to add something to the port's matedata that makes pkg aware and easy notiable > like using a specific color for portname and related information to signal > like if it's red it means abandonware and potentially reduced security. Of course, we need to inform users but not enforce. Tools, not policy. Eugene