From nobody Wed Jul 10 15:49:59 2024 X-Original-To: ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4WK2PH0SPlz5Qh8r for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2024 15:50:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from SRS0=Q6zq=OK=quip.cz=000.fbsd@elsa.codelab.cz) Received: from elsa.codelab.cz (elsa.codelab.cz [94.124.105.4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4WK2PG0YF2z4XJl for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2024 15:50:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from SRS0=Q6zq=OK=quip.cz=000.fbsd@elsa.codelab.cz) Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=quip.cz header.s=private header.b=tzToU0tK; dkim=pass header.d=quip.cz header.s=private header.b=l6lDzGlB; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of "SRS0=Q6zq=OK=quip.cz=000.fbsd@elsa.codelab.cz" has no SPF policy when checking 94.124.105.4) smtp.mailfrom="SRS0=Q6zq=OK=quip.cz=000.fbsd@elsa.codelab.cz" Received: from elsa.codelab.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by elsa.codelab.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3697FD788C for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2024 17:50:01 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=quip.cz; s=private; t=1720626601; bh=vncU7dQcAYV5gnC6+306K87ktV7GIJEvUzR6ZkEW91U=; h=Date:Subject:To:References:From:In-Reply-To; b=tzToU0tKVlOK+434XYuVdXD+wv8QO+s5ZVh/QUSCwwALB7Prs31nxFjzRFGKgtRWd jgb7BMEhTCizcgeWwGMYxZyuTJsdJNy14GgVfYvVMjvQuNgl/gLsK4JjBfIPHHvR4l lIi0NYdC3zc0gSpjUBTuA99myk7y4f2gjZJCMm6s= Received: from [192.168.145.49] (ip-89-177-27-225.bb.vodafone.cz [89.177.27.225]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by elsa.codelab.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 36B59D788F for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2024 17:50:00 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=quip.cz; s=private; t=1720626600; bh=vncU7dQcAYV5gnC6+306K87ktV7GIJEvUzR6ZkEW91U=; h=Date:Subject:To:References:From:In-Reply-To; b=l6lDzGlBLxPitx+WNGQiDCYyq4Fs0+zPl3FXK/vvOwSBjSSSMXsvCN3beTNHwlA4i MLOOYIFzs+phvpFYtlFAPsU9X5h3fQKK4gb+T+KutbJHg3nb9mw2dwDjcdvxP54QFH hOGZCikadbWBp9vIQ4OMX1saoShr45pn0UaxMN9E= Message-ID: <8caa7e52-d84e-4e9b-8a24-6deee13764f9@quip.cz> Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2024 17:49:59 +0200 List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: Using dma for external incoming mail To: ports@freebsd.org References: <202407070814.4678Ebdm011129@nuc.oldach.net> <86y16a6x77.fsf@ltc.des.dev> Content-Language: cs-Cestina From: Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spamd-Bar: -- X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.99 / 15.00]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-0.999]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[000.fbsd@quip.cz,SRS0=Q6zq=OK=quip.cz=000.fbsd@elsa.codelab.cz]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[quip.cz:s=private]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; XM_UA_NO_VERSION(0.01)[]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[no SPF record]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[quip.cz]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:42000, ipnet:94.124.104.0/21, country:CZ]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; MLMMJ_DEST(0.00)[ports@freebsd.org]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[000.fbsd@quip.cz,SRS0=Q6zq=OK=quip.cz=000.fbsd@elsa.codelab.cz]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[ports@freebsd.org]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[quip.cz:+] X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4WK2PG0YF2z4XJl On 10/07/2024 16:35, bob prohaska wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 10, 2024 at 12:02:20AM +0200, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: >> bob prohaska writes: >>> It looks like all I need is SPF and TLS, [...] >> >> You also need DKIM. >> > Going by: https://support.google.com/a/answer/81126?hl=en > > If I'm reading right, that requirement applies only to > senders of more than 5000 mails per day. I'm sending > one or two, at most. > > Do I misunderstand something > > Thanks for writing! I maintain a small mail server with about dozen of active domains. Average traffic is under 50 outgoing messages per day but Gmail refused messages until I set SPF and DKIM for each domain. If there was ever a traffic of more than 5000 messages per day it was many years ago due to hacked sender account sending spam. So I think it is very easy to be blocked by Gmail. It is not about domain, but by the IP of the server I think. YMMV Miroslav Lachman