Re: LDFLAGS= -pthread situation
- Reply: Nuno Teixeira : "Re: LDFLAGS= -pthread situation"
- In reply to: Nuno Teixeira : "LDFLAGS= -pthread situation"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2024 11:10:52 UTC
On Mon, 29 Jan 2024 09:27:02 +0000 Nuno Teixeira <eduardo@freebsd.org> wrote: > Hello all! > > I was updating games/exult-devel and I found that build failed with: > > ld: error: undefined symbol: pthread_create > >>> referenced by LowLevelMidiDriver.cpp > >>> LowLevelMidiDriver.o:(std::__1::thread::thread<int (&)(LowLevelMidiDriver*) <snip> > > > Related to a upstream change about threading support from C++11... > > Using LDFLAGS= -pthread fixed build and it is present in lot of ports. > > My question is if upstream could do anything to avoid this LDFLAGS addition. > This is being discussed at https://github.com/exult/exult/issues/436 > > Any sugestions are welcome! > > Thanks, > > -- > Nuno Teixeira > FreeBSD Committer (ports) Different port, but looks very similar situation with Bug 275950 [1], which I've filed but still not yet triaged (Status: New). [1] https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=275950 -- Tomoaki AOKI <junchoon@dec.sakura.ne.jp>