From nobody Fri Jan 26 09:55:11 2024 X-Original-To: ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4TLtNQ1tsqz58305 for ; Fri, 26 Jan 2024 09:55:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portmaster@bsdforge.com) Received: from udns.ultimatedns.net (udns.ultimatedns.net [24.113.41.81]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "ultimatedns.net", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4TLtNQ0Tk3z4rHN; Fri, 26 Jan 2024 09:55:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portmaster@bsdforge.com) Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none Received: from ultimatedns.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by udns.ultimatedns.net (8.16.1/8.16.1) with ESMTP id 40Q9tBb6047173; Fri, 26 Jan 2024 01:55:17 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from portmaster@bsdforge.com) List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2024 01:55:11 -0800 From: Chris To: Gleb Popov Cc: freebsd-ports Subject: Re: This is going to break port building without poudriere! In-Reply-To: References: User-Agent: UDNSMS/17.0 Message-ID: <068d39a84e9702c0fd9a036e13d21464@bsdforge.com> X-Sender: portmaster@bsdforge.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4TLtNQ0Tk3z4rHN X-Spamd-Bar: ---- X-Rspamd-Pre-Result: action=no action; module=replies; Message is reply to one we originated X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:11404, ipnet:24.113.0.0/16, country:US] On 2024-01-26 00:41, Gleb Popov wrote: > P.S. I made a little writeup on Ports features, which tries to explain > what subpackages really are. You might find it useful: > http://arrowd.name/ports_writeup I really appreciate the write up! Makes for a nice overview. The differential at first glance was a bit daunting. Will flavors and all still remain? Or will subpackages subsume options/flavors? Thanks. --Chris