From nobody Fri Jan 26 01:07:44 2024 X-Original-To: ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4TLfgq4BVxz58QFQ for ; Fri, 26 Jan 2024 01:07:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cy.schubert@cschubert.com) Received: from omta002.cacentral1.a.cloudfilter.net (omta002.cacentral1.a.cloudfilter.net [3.97.99.33]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "Client", Issuer "CA" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4TLfgm6rmsz44y9 for ; Fri, 26 Jan 2024 01:07:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cy.schubert@cschubert.com) Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of cy.schubert@cschubert.com has no SPF policy when checking 3.97.99.33) smtp.mailfrom=cy.schubert@cschubert.com Received: from shw-obgw-4004a.ext.cloudfilter.net ([10.228.9.227]) by cmsmtp with ESMTPS id T5Wkr1DsbGAIJTAh8r0nlS; Fri, 26 Jan 2024 01:07:46 +0000 Received: from spqr.komquats.com ([70.66.152.170]) by cmsmtp with ESMTPSA id TAh7r8HtDWhyfTAh8r3sCp; Fri, 26 Jan 2024 01:07:46 +0000 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.4 cv=MenPuI/f c=1 sm=1 tr=0 ts=65b305e2 a=y8EK/9tc/U6QY+pUhnbtgQ==:117 a=y8EK/9tc/U6QY+pUhnbtgQ==:17 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=dEuoMetlWLkA:10 a=NEAV23lmAAAA:8 a=YxBL1-UpAAAA:8 a=6I5d2MoRAAAA:8 a=EkcXrb_YAAAA:8 a=K29TOdojtvr4bpERIe4A:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=Ia-lj3WSrqcvXOmTRaiG:22 a=IjZwj45LgO3ly-622nXo:22 a=LK5xJRSDVpKd5WXXoEvA:22 Received: from slippy.cwsent.com (slippy [10.1.1.91]) by spqr.komquats.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D45E5A38; Thu, 25 Jan 2024 17:07:44 -0800 (PST) Received: by slippy.cwsent.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 9CDC4389; Thu, 25 Jan 2024 17:07:44 -0800 (PST) X-Mailer: exmh version 2.9.0 11/07/2018 with nmh-1.8+dev Reply-to: Cy Schubert From: Cy Schubert X-os: FreeBSD X-Sender: cy@cwsent.com X-URL: http://www.cschubert.com/ To: Tom Rushworth cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: sysutils/nut maintainer mail rejection In-reply-to: References: Comments: In-reply-to Tom Rushworth message dated "Thu, 25 Jan 2024 16:45:00 -0800." List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2024 17:07:44 -0800 Message-Id: <20240126010744.9CDC4389@slippy.cwsent.com> X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4xfFq5zBZZCQszdlB0Oj+4w1ua4lTgPEVYPI+cG81zHE54QtBCMs7+Vz7aWGmYIvLG6hGrug1N/ao/nsUw2f1BvSZln1s+4B1qDjEB7YHpy4pLTfFwJgR8 N/UbNKd6MJGxZjp4r7TJGV09n/N4llyHGhUfrL15DkShd5aCUu6fXOQhsBM/C6Vftk2NaZ7xtE/ASv5ZxTATft1eYvQqkc1LrHKO7RWWlsgd/CC60rrNqH0x X-Spamd-Bar: - X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.70 / 15.00]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-0.998]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[3.97.99.33:from]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[cschubert.com]; FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[gmail.com]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[no SPF record]; ASN(0.00)[asn:16509, ipnet:3.96.0.0/15, country:US]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.00)[Cy.Schubert@cschubert.com]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MLMMJ_DEST(0.00)[ports@freebsd.org]; TAGGED_RCPT(0.00)[]; REPLYTO_EQ_FROM(0.00)[] X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4TLfgm6rmsz44y9 In message , Tom Rushworth writes: > Sorry for the noise folks, I'll keep this brief. My original ports > question is at the bottom. > > On 2024-01-25 15:37, Cy Schubert wrote: > > In message om> > > The gmail address is the one I'm using to send to this list, and it > seems to work there. > I don't get it, but we probably shouldn't spend too much time on it. > > > The ports question that started all this: > > I'm hoping you are the right person for this question. You're listed as > the maintainer on both ports mentioned in the subject above. > > I've got an experimental NUT driver for an Alpha Technologies CFR1500RM > UPS. I doubt there are many of these old UPSes in use, but I was > planning to offer it to the NUT community anyways. I started the driver > directly from the NUT sources and only afterwards realized there was a > port (or ports). Since it still needs some work I'd like to set it up > as a patch I can apply to the ports tree locally so I can work on it in > sync with the FreeBSD ports system. > > Which port should I use - sysutils/nut or sysutils/nut-devel ? So far > the only changes needed are to drivers/Makefile.am and the actual new > driver source. I won't accept a patch for an experimental driver until a pull request to our upstream has been submitted first, then only to the -devel port. If they refuse to accept the patch, I will need to remove it from the port as well. Another option may be to add an option for an experimental driver from which we can fetch your sources from. You'd need to provide a URL. I'm not prepared to add the patch cart blanche because if it breaks I'm not prepared to diagnose and debug it for you. Preferred is an upstream pull request. Their URL is https://github.com/networkupstools/nut. BTW, I found the problematic postfix rule and have fixed it. Sorry about the bother. -- Cheers, Cy Schubert FreeBSD UNIX: Web: https://FreeBSD.org NTP: Web: https://nwtime.org e^(i*pi)+1=0