From nobody Wed Jan 24 22:55:55 2024 X-Original-To: ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4TKzp8136xz58snn for ; Wed, 24 Jan 2024 22:56:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from SRS0=ISnb=JC=quip.cz=000.fbsd@elsa.codelab.cz) Received: from elsa.codelab.cz (elsa.codelab.cz [94.124.105.4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4TKzp72lkVz4h8j; Wed, 24 Jan 2024 22:55:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from SRS0=ISnb=JC=quip.cz=000.fbsd@elsa.codelab.cz) Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=quip.cz header.s=private header.b=fhUab3jK; dkim=pass header.d=quip.cz header.s=private header.b=YX4UTRHI; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of "SRS0=ISnb=JC=quip.cz=000.fbsd@elsa.codelab.cz" has no SPF policy when checking 94.124.105.4) smtp.mailfrom="SRS0=ISnb=JC=quip.cz=000.fbsd@elsa.codelab.cz" Received: from elsa.codelab.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by elsa.codelab.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84C5AD7890; Wed, 24 Jan 2024 23:55:56 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=quip.cz; s=private; t=1706136956; bh=Zvxtmi+DIoIHIS58Mf85Xz8kzrNbB8VJv/B5YpKD3Lg=; h=Date:To:Cc:From:Subject; b=fhUab3jKwCm/O67krf7+85sxPzTNOpWQpcRo+d2jpDK9x57YjkniGImkNdiZyaxS8 J8h16owRrfIyNgJvQONon7/yLO61kchoTwc3/J/wNyEbhaKL/YbVhpvewu+tVKTJX1 oEvt0J1Fa+iV+P83HMk3/cs2dP+BqHPbP3N/pSio= Received: from [192.168.145.49] (ip-89-177-27-225.bb.vodafone.cz [89.177.27.225]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by elsa.codelab.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B2FF1D788B; Wed, 24 Jan 2024 23:55:55 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=quip.cz; s=private; t=1706136955; bh=Zvxtmi+DIoIHIS58Mf85Xz8kzrNbB8VJv/B5YpKD3Lg=; h=Date:To:Cc:From:Subject; b=YX4UTRHIxfNGLpPYSGtxTp0Rr74D/X99be4OoS5Dua+Q5dlaaRk73Yv5ybrx1HwLW IYmUgvEa7emDb4gSwwfFKDk5Zg8Q1rDUTT9lDaSItNG13ymmPzP6szAcR9AqhUoWhO IKfz1wULTEYCE9H4IkCR6s+ePDcOyDNVQhY3UUu0= Message-ID: <0adddfba-0646-44eb-a3cf-dc460019a70e@quip.cz> Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2024 23:55:55 +0100 List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird To: ports@freebsd.org Content-Language: cs-Cestina Cc: rust@FreeBSD.org From: Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz> Subject: lang/rust PORT_LLVM=on Dependency loop detected Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spamd-Bar: -- X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.98 / 15.00]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.99)[-0.986]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[000.fbsd@quip.cz,SRS0=ISnb=JC=quip.cz=000.fbsd@elsa.codelab.cz]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[quip.cz:s=private]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; XM_UA_NO_VERSION(0.01)[]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[no SPF record]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:42000, ipnet:94.124.104.0/21, country:CZ]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[quip.cz]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; MLMMJ_DEST(0.00)[ports@freebsd.org]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[000.fbsd@quip.cz,SRS0=ISnb=JC=quip.cz=000.fbsd@elsa.codelab.cz]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[quip.cz:+] X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4TKzp72lkVz4h8j I tried to build our package set (in Poudriere) with the new option PORT_LLVM=on for lang/rust, but it seems it does not work / has not been tested, or we have some other non-default options that cause the following error: [00:00:57] Error: Dependency loop detected: These packages depend on each other: py39-openssl-23.2.0,1 py39-cryptography-41.0.7_1,1 rust-1.74.1 llvm15-15.0.7_9 py39-recommonmark-0.5.0_2 py39-sphinx-5.3.0_1,1 py39-requests-2.31.0 py39-urllib3-1.26.18,1 These packages depend on each other: rust-1.74.1 llvm15-15.0.7_9 py39-recommonmark-0.5.0_2 py39-sphinx-5.3.0_1,1 py39-requests-2.31.0 py39-urllib3-1.26.18,1 py39-openssl-23.2.0,1 py39-cryptography-41.0.7_1,1 py39-setuptools-rust-1.8.1 Is it supposed to work? How can I trace what port / option is pulling "bad dependency"? Kind regards Miroslav Lachman