Re: CI for ports
- In reply to: Janky Jay, III: "Re: CI for ports"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2024 19:51:42 UTC
> On Dec 30, 2023, at 1:02 AM, Janky Jay, III <jankyj@unfs.us> wrote: > > This is great to hear! Thank you, Moin! > > Regards, > Janky Jay, III > > On 12/28/23 06:09PM, Moin Rahman wrote: >> >>> On Dec 29, 2023, at 2:07 AM, Rozhuk Ivan <rozhuk.im@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> Hi! >>> >>> >>> Can we please have at least BASIC continues integration for ports? >>> Just check that it can be build and if tests exist then it run without errors. >>> >>> Or a bit advanced CI that also will build ports with all SSL/SAMBA/LLVM/etc >>> versions. >>> >>> portlint and other atochekers and helpers can be integrateg to CI too. >>> >>> This all will make life easy for maiteiner and users will more happy. >>> >>> >>> >>> Also will be very nice to move from phabricator+Bugzilla to something more >>> modern and useful, like gitea/gitlab... >>> >>> >> Ah damn. I totally forgot about it. I have worked on one and it's functional. >> >> But I will activate it sometimes in the next month. >> >> You will be able to open a Github PR and the test will be done through Cirrus CI. >> >> Kind regards, >> Moin > > Just to let everyone know that this will be delayed by one more month as metals have not yet arrived and our plan of deploying the new site has been delayed. So this will be delayed too. :( Kind regards, Moin