From nobody Mon Jan 22 21:02:35 2024 X-Original-To: ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4TJjRB2dJ2z58D7H for ; Mon, 22 Jan 2024 21:05:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from naddy@mips.inka.de) Received: from mail.inka.de (mail.inka.de [IPv6:2a04:c9c7:0:1073:217:a4ff:fe3b:e77c]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4TJjR92H41z4Kvn for ; Mon, 22 Jan 2024 21:05:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from naddy@mips.inka.de) Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of naddy@mips.inka.de has no SPF policy when checking 2a04:c9c7:0:1073:217:a4ff:fe3b:e77c) smtp.mailfrom=naddy@mips.inka.de Received: from mips.inka.de (naddy@[127.0.0.1]) by mail.inka.de with uucp (rmailwrap 0.5) id 1rS1Td-00Cfl1-7r; Mon, 22 Jan 2024 22:05:05 +0100 Received: from lorvorc.mips.inka.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lorvorc.mips.inka.de (8.17.1/8.17.1) with ESMTP id 40ML2ZAK084943 for ; Mon, 22 Jan 2024 22:02:35 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from naddy@lorvorc.mips.inka.de) Received: (from naddy@localhost) by lorvorc.mips.inka.de (8.17.1/8.17.1/Submit) id 40ML2Zba084942 for ports@freebsd.org; Mon, 22 Jan 2024 22:02:35 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from naddy) Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2024 22:02:35 +0100 From: Christian Weisgerber To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Call for help: moving manpages to share/man Message-ID: References: List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Spamd-Bar: -- X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.10 / 15.00]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; ASN(0.00)[asn:202113, ipnet:2a04:c9c7::/32, country:DE]; FREEFALL_USER(0.00)[naddy]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROMTLD(0.00)[]; MISSING_XM_UA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MLMMJ_DEST(0.00)[ports@freebsd.org]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[ports@freebsd.org]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[inka.de]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[no SPF record] X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4TJjR92H41z4Kvn Gleb Popov: > I've created a branch [1] in my own fork that switches mandir for the > autotools build system and am inviting everyone to collaborate on > that, until all the fallout is fixed. I'm asking port maintainers to > check if they have ports with the "GNU_CONFIGURE=yes" knob, as these > are most likely broken by the switch. > > If you want to collaborate either create a pull request on GH against > my branch or just send me a git format-patch output for your change. One commit per port or squashed? -- Christian "naddy" Weisgerber naddy@mips.inka.de