From nobody Fri Jan 12 23:53:48 2024 X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4TBdfY1Mfhz56gXm for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2024 23:53:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jamie@catflap.org) Received: from donotpassgo.dyslexicfish.net (donotpassgo.dyslexicfish.net [IPv6:2001:19f0:7400:8808:123::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4TBdfY0FPZz50BF; Fri, 12 Jan 2024 23:53:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jamie@catflap.org) Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Catflap-Envelope-From: Received: from donotpassgo.dyslexicfish.net (donotpassgo.dyslexicfish.net [209.250.224.51]) by donotpassgo.dyslexicfish.net (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id 40CNrmEO004326; Fri, 12 Jan 2024 23:53:48 GMT (envelope-from jamie@donotpassgo.dyslexicfish.net) Received: (from jamie@localhost) by donotpassgo.dyslexicfish.net (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id 40CNrmUf004325; Fri, 12 Jan 2024 23:53:48 GMT (envelope-from jamie) From: Jamie Landeg-Jones Message-Id: <202401122353.40CNrmUf004325@donotpassgo.dyslexicfish.net> Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2024 23:53:48 +0000 Organization: Dyslexic Fish To: jamie@catflap.org, danfe@freebsd.org Cc: portmaster@bsdforge.com, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD ports disabled for bsdforge References: <202401111126.40BBQgJ4028906@donotpassgo.dyslexicfish.net> <4ae511b8cf4e21ecfa8b4283ea369f6f@bsdforge.com> <202401121400.40CE04P1085845@donotpassgo.dyslexicfish.net> In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Heirloom mailx 12.4 7/29/08 List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender passed SPF test, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (donotpassgo.dyslexicfish.net [209.250.224.51]); Fri, 12 Jan 2024 23:53:49 +0000 (GMT) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4TBdfY0FPZz50BF X-Spamd-Bar: ---- X-Rspamd-Pre-Result: action=no action; module=replies; Message is reply to one we originated X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:20473, ipnet:2001:19f0:7400::/38, country:US] Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > It was very rash, but for endangered ports, they'll use any possibility. Fair enough. > Muhammad seldom responds to email these days; for both of them I believe > this situation (Chris' domain renewal and him coming back online) is > uncomfortable as they both want for his ports to die ASAP. :( OK, good to know. I don't know anything about this history, I just thought it worth mentioning when I noticed 80 odd ports dropped as unfetchable which now all work. I didn't think that was a controversial thing to do, and didn't mean to stir up any hornets nest! Thanks for the heads-up though! :-) Cheers, Jamie