From nobody Mon Jan 01 14:17:32 2024 X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4T3dP04qBYz56q2H for ; Mon, 1 Jan 2024 14:17:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan@langille.org) Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com (out2-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.26]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4T3dNz33Xqz4hYj for ; Mon, 1 Jan 2024 14:17:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan@langille.org) Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=langille.org header.s=fm2 header.b=cHmgeIsU; dkim=pass header.d=messagingengine.com header.s=fm2 header.b=qVVtyg3L; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of dan@langille.org designates 66.111.4.26 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=dan@langille.org; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=langille.org Received: from compute7.internal (compute7.nyi.internal [10.202.2.48]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 455AC5C00DD for ; Mon, 1 Jan 2024 09:17:54 -0500 (EST) Received: from imap42 ([10.202.2.92]) by compute7.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 01 Jan 2024 09:17:54 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=langille.org; h= cc:content-type:content-type:date:date:from:from:in-reply-to :in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject :subject:to:to; s=fm2; t=1704118674; x=1704205074; bh=/+UZo3O5iZ f8NQOcFEaLP3CXmB8vB3iEexw3I7xZKEU=; b=cHmgeIsU7UfnDxDqDoCpwM8nAv h1ontlU1v9YVH7Q6GPP44Q6o4n+VC1aKGROmL+OZMi2qDMBHQuQpkLBGjDLQA45i 0tmXSoZxrVjpJbeKJq3ynXH2kkp1LuZZ+E4/itvr9A1HPTV1TeSmIovepdx2jhW9 vZNhhQ6MlPgBeUMNPfAfVoBE0qpPCvFTDJvHeFP9ZT/k1lyhY73CUPySz7bwZpMX Fj4gIaIAtV4yCAIdYPGISd74CkihTa3w7l4Dqa5FaWTnvxLTr112mZaWm/2jo2pT eaBm+BFPtt+Q28YWIq9BtThJ16f7HHMvgMMvLDsOsqdFRxqhgv/LRZ6nMgRw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:content-type:date:date :feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject:subject:to :to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s= fm2; t=1704118674; x=1704205074; bh=/+UZo3O5iZf8NQOcFEaLP3CXmB8v B3iEexw3I7xZKEU=; b=qVVtyg3Lvh5KA20695RMNNQIHzfov9sILI2UBgumK8aF LFOyLO3OmNB5m/F4bxZ+zQqAdAPRQc/0lTsAVZrHq7YUE23i3mM1uZehX5gTEoDH f1cta4nh9HcBDNCnhMQ75X1EER6b4ktC4wPNt1jwtd4x4cXei8GRKP5Ytdtyx1aZ xXC7MUaU9Y3GM9IL63wWUBbAd3v69rmjE2GDcSYq1rbpkWtjmkq40/a934nk5ovr h8A3IJKU0VCa4+fDnlib7XStr4hNAItnMS1ya/5tQe1W4o7/DD3KeBZFrnWy/NAq pLLnXSp9SzjkrpZsEaRk6Lodw1+umjqLPwAuJrX4CQ== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvkedrvdegtddgiedvucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpefofgggkfgjfhffhffvufgtsehttd ertderredtnecuhfhrohhmpedfffgrnhcunfgrnhhgihhllhgvfdcuoegurghnsehlrghn ghhilhhlvgdrohhrgheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepleejgfegueehueeiveelvdejve fgudetueekgffgffeiveehudfgffevheejveffnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptden ucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepuggrnheslhgrnhhgihhllhgvrdhorhhg X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: ifbf9424e:Fastmail Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id E4B22BC0081; Mon, 1 Jan 2024 09:17:53 -0500 (EST) X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.9.0-alpha0-1364-ga51d5fd3b7-fm-20231219.001-ga51d5fd3 List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: In-Reply-To: References: <95c256b2-ec07-4867-bfa2-32f39ba88504@app.fastmail.com> Date: Mon, 01 Jan 2024 09:17:32 -0500 From: "Dan Langille" To: freebsd-ports Subject: Re: net-mgmt/net-snmp needs JAIL : off to get Memory usage Content-Type: text/plain X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-5.19 / 15.00]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; DWL_DNSWL_LOW(-1.00)[messagingengine.com:dkim]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[langille.org,none]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:66.111.4.26]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[langille.org:s=fm2,messagingengine.com:s=fm2]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_GOOD(-0.10)[66.111.4.26:from]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[66.111.4.26:from]; XM_UA_NO_VERSION(0.01)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MLMMJ_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-ports@freebsd.org]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[langille.org:+,messagingengine.com:+]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; FREEFALL_USER(0.00)[dan]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:19151, ipnet:66.111.4.0/24, country:US]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-ports@freebsd.org]; ARC_NA(0.00)[] X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4T3dNz33Xqz4hYj X-Spamd-Bar: ----- On Thu, Dec 28, 2023, at 1:24 PM, Dan Langille wrote: > On Thu, Dec 28, 2023, at 11:28 AM, Dan Langille wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I've just solved a long-puzzling issue with net-mgmt/net-snmp which was >> not reporting Memory Usage on my hosts. >> >> Tests show it is related to the JAIL build-time configuration option. >> >> JAIL=off: Options for running snmpd within a jail(8) >> >> If off, the default, Memory Usage is available via snmpd. >> >> If on, it is not. >> >> One might ask: why have it on if not running in a jail? >> >> Simplicity: I build my own packages. I could have one repo specifically >> for hosts (i.e. non-jails), but until now, it's never been an issue. >> >> However, I want to point that that JAIL=off does not seem to affect >> usage within a jail. >> >> It becomes clear what JAIL does when looking at the Makefile: >> >> if ${PORT_OPTIONS:MJAIL} >> NET_SNMP_WITHOUT_MIB_MODULE_LIST+= host >> NET_SNMP_WITHOUT_MIB_MODULE_LIST+= ucd-snmp/memory >> CONFIGURE_ARGS+= --without-kmem-usage >> endif >> >> Not it's clear. Don't report host-like objects when within a jail. >> >> It is time for some flavors on this port? I know I'd like one for my >> use: one without the above and with. >> >> I'll see if I can mangle something up which works. > > This works for me. > > -- > Dan Langille > dan@langille.org > Attachments: > * patch-net-snmp-jail-flavor I forgot the mailing list strips attachments. Here is that patch, pasted in: [9:16 air01 dan ~/Downloads] % cat patch-net-snmp-jail-flavor diff --git a/net-mgmt/net-snmp/Makefile b/net-mgmt/net-snmp/Makefile index e5f60faefcbd..686c393991ea 100644 --- a/net-mgmt/net-snmp/Makefile +++ b/net-mgmt/net-snmp/Makefile @@ -18,6 +18,17 @@ LICENSE_FILE= ${WRKSRC}/COPYING NOT_FOR_ARCHS= mips mips64 NOT_FOR_ARCHS_REASON= SSP is currently broken on MIPS +FLAVORS= default jail +FLAVORS?= ${FLAVORS:[1]} + +.if ${FLAVOR:U} == jail +NET_SNMP_WITHOUT_MIB_MODULE_LIST+= host +NET_SNMP_WITHOUT_MIB_MODULE_LIST+= ucd-snmp/memory +CONFIGURE_ARGS+= --without-kmem-usage +.endif + +jail_PKGNAMESUFFIX= -jail + OPTIONS_DEFINE= IPV6 MFD_REWRITES PERL PERL_EMBEDDED PYTHON DUMMY TKMIB \ MYSQL AX_SOCKONLY UNPRIVILEGED SMUX DOCS JAIL AX_DISABLE_TRAP \ TLS NEWSYSLOG NOLIBPKG SCTP [9:17 air01 dan ~/Downloads] % -- Dan Langille dan@langille.org